• Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
    cake
    ·
    3 years ago

    It’s not a liability and none of my critiques of Doreen were due to her gender or trans status. They were valid critiques of tactical failure.

    My point is that on this site, trans-ness is not a liability - in fact it acts as an impenetrable shield that will get people to start telling communists to go to the wall over completely legitimate criticisms. It causes you to act irrationally and defend and indefensible person and situation when you should be dunking instead

    • DragonNest_Aidit [they/them,use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      If you've been here for longer than a month then you'll know that site have been criticizing r/antiwork long before this thing blew up. We have been denouncing it for various reason: that it's a liberal relief valve, that it took away energy from actual leftism, that it's just PMC capital strike.

      The one group we always shut downs in this site with no exception are critics of AES states. Whatever people think about it, this site is unwaveringly pro-China, Cuba, DPRK, etc. Is that what you're complaining about? That we defend DPRK?

      • Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
        cake
        ·
        3 years ago

        It’s true on this site, not out in the world. As long as a user claims to be trans they are able to bludgeon and threaten others into irrational anti-materialist positions

          • Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
            cake
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            There is no victim hood, I’m making a critique about the ways in which this site acts in irrational ways on this subject due to overreaction

            Like you’ve managed to put yourself on the side as a Vaush-tier rapist and national embarrassment, calling for the death of communist members of this site. That doesn’t strike you at all as odd?