Almost all of that land "belonged" to Mexico because that's what the Europeans agreed on. Mexico had zero control over it. By any modern standard those territories were fully under control of nations like the Comanche.
If that was feasible, then I would call that preferable than being ruled by the Mexican federal goverment.
(Edit) actually its more feasible than you'd think. Many first nations ask leftist groups to do land acknowledgements. In a way, thats them telling any future workers councils that they call dibs.
Almost all of that land "belonged" to Mexico because that's what the Europeans agreed on. Mexico had zero control over it. By any modern standard those territories were fully under control of nations like the Comanche.
So the US should be broken up by native territory?
If that was feasible, then I would call that preferable than being ruled by the Mexican federal goverment.
(Edit) actually its more feasible than you'd think. Many first nations ask leftist groups to do land acknowledgements. In a way, thats them telling any future workers councils that they call dibs.