Yeah I feel either this type of power set or the inverse being a druid Shepard in which you help to empower your fellow proletariat and they in turn come to your aid in a time of need would also be pretty dope and would at least not push the whole "great man of history" stereotype.
The problem with the great man of history theory isnwe keep trying tobapply it to men are who are not great. Look at somebody like stalin. Who actually did robin hood shit. Son of a cobbler robbing banks and spreading revolution. As opposed to the people liberals want to use it on, like rich failsons who happened to bribe the right people at the right time.
True, I think there's balance in historically remembering awesome peeps in the socialist struggle but not to idolize them but instead learn from the best parts of them to better facilitate praxis
Yeah I feel either this type of power set or the inverse being a druid Shepard in which you help to empower your fellow proletariat and they in turn come to your aid in a time of need would also be pretty dope and would at least not push the whole "great man of history" stereotype.
The problem with the great man of history theory isnwe keep trying tobapply it to men are who are not great. Look at somebody like stalin. Who actually did robin hood shit. Son of a cobbler robbing banks and spreading revolution. As opposed to the people liberals want to use it on, like rich failsons who happened to bribe the right people at the right time.
True, I think there's balance in historically remembering awesome peeps in the socialist struggle but not to idolize them but instead learn from the best parts of them to better facilitate praxis