Permanently Deleted

  • ssjmarx [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Something that often gets lost in T-34 vs Panzer comparisons is the fact that not only did the Soviets build about twice as many tanks as the Germans over the course of the war, their tanks were also built with field serviceability in mind meaning that a higher proportion of Soviet tanks remained in action at any given time. If a T-34 it broke down you could re-track it or patch the engine or whatever you needed to do, unlike a Panther which needed specialized facilities.

    • karl3422 [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      way more than twice as many thousands of Nazi tanks verses tens of thousands of Soviet tanks and that's just Nazi vs Soviet tank deployment if you add in US tank production it's thousands vs just under a hundred thousand

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yeah, but Tigers bro

      Ignores that Tigers broke down so damn often that only a fraction of them were ever in service

      More fun Tiger facts: Germany had to put out a call to tankers to not tow a broken Tiger with another Tiger, because their shitty gearbox was not rated for it. Meaning that you would sometimes have a scenario where one broken Tiger turned into two lmao

      • machiabelly [she/her]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Currently imagining two german squads trying to fix two massive tanks in a flat grassland with no air superiority. :wholesome: