Wikipedia is definitely credible trust me bro they’re listening to unbiased UKRAINIAN propaganda instead of conniving Russian propaganda

  • Bratsva1 [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Check the source and those are stats from the first day and haven't been updated since. So are people just upset that up to date stats aren't being posted if no one is reporting?

    • NuraShiny [any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Are you shook? I ask because you replied the same fucking thing to me three times.

      These stats were obviously false on day 1 as well so I don't see how you are making a good argument.

      • Bratsva1 [none/use name]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Shook, hot and bothered. Also the first day was mostly just air strikes on Ukrainian ports and airports, where the aim was to just damage the infrastructure, so believeable

    • WhyEssEff [she/her]
      ·
      3 years ago

      doesn't matter, under no reasonable circumstances should that data have been allowed to stay up there uncritically for as long as it did if wikipedia cared one semblance about factuality. If there's no verifiable information, you should put up no information.

    • ShareThatBread [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The “source” is the BBC reporting on a Facebook post which they then explicitly state the figures are not verifiable. Fucking moron.