If I retire, I'm probably going to be sharing Marxist and Anarchist extremist content on Facebook the way boomers still post about Obama today.
This was the common "retirement" for peasants living under heavy serfdom. They faced hunger every year so the old people unable to work "went to forest for firewood" or "go to hunt" to die there with some dignity and remove the excess mouth. A lot of time this was forced, and it happened not only to old people but to disabled, women and children, especially in worse years.
I feel like there’s probabilities associated with that stuff. Most people’s retirements are tied to stock markets
No information can impact the worldview of Washington Post staffers
They are, I lost 300 dollars last week from my "retirement savings" lmao
In Poland we had the Argentinian system implemented, the one that gives private companies free hand with your mandatory savings and caused failure of retirement system and fall of government in Argentina. In 10 years i lost about 30% of what i paid into it because stockmarket play failures and very high fees taken by those that played. Basically everyone else also lost which forced a liberal government to give people option out of it into huge state company buying bonds, which is also shit but at least you won't lose everything because state institution won't just (hopefully) run away with your money.
And btw all this didn't caused any social unrest in Poland and the improvement, literally the only good thing libs ever did, caused massive outrage.
Yea, but real talk: barring the collapse of the US empire, you will make money in the long run.
What happened to pensions? Did Reagan mess that up too?
conspiracy by big bank to force you to care about "the economy"
They also make broker commissions and account fees from holding investments. Just skimming right off your earnings
it is so fucked, if you earn little and you get auto-enrolled into a default scheme with high fees in the UK, literally your entire savings will be eroded by fees within the year
A tweet
Kinda surprised owning your own home wasn't a part of this. For a long time that was the signature marker of "you've made it into the middle class."
I love that "can afford to raise children" isn't even here
The society of freedom and family values
the term "middle class" originated from the aristocratic ruling class of european feudalism
when people's place in society was determined by blood, by birth, there were two classes: peasants and nobility (and also there was clergy but there's always more detail, isn't there, so lets ignore the more fiddly categories...). As industrialization and market relations grew out of the early modern period, a funny thing started happening: there were people, born as peasants, who, through their property, started to amass wealth equal to (and often greater than!) the nobility. The nobles didn't like that. They looked down on this strange class that was caught in the middle of two worlds. Middle Class has historically referred to the Capitalists.
I know today the term just means a sort of vague gesture to some 'average of people'. But that's fucking useless. It only really acts to obfuscate the real defining characteristic of modern class; birthright has been replaced with the right of property (specifically property that generates a passive source of income for the owner). I highly advise to rail against, or at least avoid, the term "middle class". It just serves as a wedge to divide different levels of working class people from one another -- that's not a successful way to talk about and promote working class interests!
Nowadays, in the US (and other anglo nations), it means "Not literally starving in the street and not a billionaire". At least, that's what it feels like
A tweet
Was reading about the three-legged stool the other day re retirement and realized too many people probably do not even know the term or what it refers to. Our politicians have stolen the American dream with zero consequence.
I'm older than most of you but I still didn't know that term and I had to google. I almost laughed when I learned the definition.
Three-Legged Stool: Meaning, Overview, History
The "three-legged stool" is an old phrase that many financial planners once used to describe the three most common sources of retirement income: Social Security, employee pensions, and personal savings. It was expected that this trio would together provide a solid financial foundation for the senior years. None of the three was expected to support most retirees on its own.
They removed the employee pension part of the leg and replaced it 401k's which have only been around since the 80's and there is not a generation of people that have retired on them.
The concept of a pension was retired. But financial "innovations" like gig economy, copays, deductibles, medical bankruptcy, student debts, etc have been greatly expanded. Capitalism, baby!
401k's which have only been around since the 80's and there is not a generation of people that have retired on them.
damn, somehow I know that after all my 401k-less comrads die in the freemarket famines, of 2050, probably the last rugpull on my generation will be the collapse of 401ks. Then in 2070 there will be YouTube videos explaining why 401ks were an obvious scam from the beginning, but you probably won't find anyone explaining/claiming that today. It's just going to happen somehow I know it lol.
That's bullshit that 35% of Americans have all six. Only 50% Americans even have a job. Mayyybe 35% of Americans have the first one.
It's probably counted by household rather than individuals, to be unreasonably generous to them
Yeah that doesn’t even pass the sniff test. How do they even print garbage like that?
I thought everyone rich enough not to live somewhere with holes in the walls and poor enough not to own a golf course considered themselves "middle class."
A thoroughly useless term.
folks with holes in the wall still imagine themselves "middle class" if washed thoroughly enough in ideology. you ever talk to those old folks that say shit like 'we never thought we were poor' and then talk about getting a coal stipend to not freeze in the winter as a core childhood memory
No one has a “secure job” btw
Feel free to believe your job is secure all you want, but when the stock market dips or your soulless company wants to take in more profits, workforce reductions affect everyone
What if my retirement plan is to fix my credit, get a small business loan and defect to Cuba with the money?
That is essentially what big companies do. So that means it is a viable plan, and probably arbitrarily hard for us
I bet if you removed people over like 50-55 that number would drop to single digits due to 6)
A tweet
I wonder what this would have looked like in the 1960's and 1970's.
“Middle class” is a term used by other working class people with puritanical brain rot who just want to distance themselves from the poor as much as possible
Does anyone else get these videos on TikTok where it's like:
- working class - £20k
- lower middle class - £30k
- middle class - £40k
- upper middle class - £50k
- upper class - £60k
- ruling class - £70k
and the comments are so uninformed that they just accept this stratification as a given. Try to explain to people that if you have to work for a living and if you stop working you die then you are working class and it doesn't compute. Nevermind that you can't actually raise a family comfortably with a single income of less than £70k in this country, if you try to explain to people actually yeah we should all be getting paid a hell of a lot more they will look at you like you've just tried to fuck their dog.
In my opinion, if a middle class exists, it is small business owners and doctor couples with a combined income of £400k, and anyone that has started to accumulate rental properties in addition to owning their own home.
