The Yakovlev Yak-3 was a single-engine, single-seat World War II Soviet fighter. Robust and easy to maintain, it was much liked by both pilots and ground crew. One of the smallest and lightest combat fighters fielded by any combatant during the war, its high power-to-weight ratio gave it excellent performance and it proved to be a formidable dogfighter.
Lighter and smaller than the Yak-9 but powered by the same engine, the Yak-3 was a forgiving, easy-to-handle aircraft loved by both novice and experienced pilots. It was robust, easy to maintain and a highly successful dog-fighter. It was used mostly as a tactical fighter, flying low over battlefields and engaging in dogfights below 4,000 m (13,000 ft).
The first 197 Yak-3 were lightly armed with a single motornaya pushka-mount 20 mm (0.79 in) ShVAK cannon and one 12.7 mm (0.50 in) UBS synchronized machine gun, with subsequent aircraft receiving a second UBS for a weight of fire of 2.72 kg (6.0 lb) per second using high-explosive ammunition. All armament was installed close to the axis of the aircraft with a cannon mounted in the engine "vee" firing through the propeller boss, synchronised machine guns in the fuselage, helping accuracy and leaving wings unloaded.
Marcel Albert, a World War II French ace who flew the Yak-3 in the USSR with the Normandie-Niémen Group, considered it a superior aircraft to the P-51D Mustang and Supermarine Spitfire. It was also flown by Polish Air Forces (of the Polish People's Army formed in USSR) and the Yugoslav Air Force, after the war.
If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can go here to reserve a spot! :xinternet:
Resources for Organizing your workplace/community :sabo:
Resources for Palestine :palestine-heart:
Buy coffee and learn more about the Zapatistas in Chiapas here :EZLN:
Here are some resources on Prison Abolition :brick-police:
Foundations of Leninism :USSR:
:lenin-shining: :unity: :kropotkin-shining:
Anarchism and Other Essays :ancom:
Remember, sort by new you :LIB:
Follow the Hexbear twitter account :comrade-birdie:
THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!) :RIchard-D-Wolff:
Come listen to music with your fellow Hexbears in Cy.tube :og-hex-bear:
Queer stuff? Come talk in the queer megathread!! :sicko-queer:
Monthly Neurodiverse Megathread and Monthly ND Venting Thread :Care-Comrade:
Are wireless earbuds any better than wired? This pair of headphones I have are getting worn the hell out.
I say go for wired as long as you can. Less likely to lose one and cheaper to replace if you do.
Fair enough. Wire management is a pain though.
I got a pair of Bluetooth aftershokz bone conduction headphones cuz I bike commute and don't like covering my ears. I'll never go back to wired
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
the main reason to get them is convenience. they generally cost more than wired, and sound quality doesn't really get good until you get to the $200+ price range.
Yeah I was thinking the convenience.
I used to go through wired headphones every couple of months. It took me 3 years to break my first wireless pair. I say its cheaper for me in the long run.
wired for me, i don't like the idea of having 2 things to keep charged so i can listen to music/audiobooks, plus better sound quality for the price, cheaper to replace, and if dangling wires are an issue i just run them under my shirt
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Removed by mod