You only really need to watch the first five minutes of it to the the basic gist of the video; but the premise is that the majority of the poverty & political instability in the (First) World is down to the lack of available & actually useable housing stock. The main problem with it however, is that the author is a 🌐-Head who unironically believes in the "Free World", and fundamentally does not understand that everything that what they want to happen won't happen because the policies that he hates benefit the people who get to make the decisions under Capitalism.

  • Ehrmantrout [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I remember watching a anti car video or something like that on this channel. Then he mentioned that world War 1 was a disaster because it led to the establishment of the USSR and I immediately realized what a moron the person is. Reminds me of azov something, another similar chud who I regretfully watched for quite some time. :sadness: :sadness: :sadness:

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I am going to miss oranges out of season when that stops being a thing in a little while.

            • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Using a Chinese-style greenhouse, perhaps sunk into the ground a little bit, with 2m deep geothermal venting and thermal-mass walls, could provide all the warm-temperate and perhaps tropical fruits that 100 people could demand. Even before a collapse of shipping, it could provide a decent income too.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    What's the point of a viable world if :epstein: adjacent vampires can't competitively destroy it for higher scores on the leaderboards?!

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      ACKSHUALLY some of those houses have mold and stuff in them so homeless shouldn't be in any of them. :so-true:

      (I've received this bazinga argument personally)

  • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    britmonkey

    angloid....... detected

    spoiler

    opinion: rejected

    :party-sicko: :party-sicko: :party-sicko: :party-sicko:

  • ssjmarx [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    HoUsInG sToCk

    The houses are there, if the government cared they could pass a law giving them to the people who need them. This really isn't a complicated issue.

  • Mizokon [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I love how they show military parades whenever "REPRESSIVE DICTATORSHIPS" are mentioned. That's a classic.