It's my weekly rest day, so no update today.

I just want to thank everybody who has engaged with these threads, from the frequent commenters, to the background lurkers, and even the people who come in thinking this is the main megathread and start telling us about their banana bread recipe or something like that.

I'm hopeful that my daily schedule will stabilise for at least the next few weeks, if not months, and I can finally get a reliable stream of updates rather than those punctuated by random breaks.

Of course, may the war end soon, and may Azov, Right Sector, and every other group get what they deserve. And, of course, these threads will continue past the end of the war - unless the end of the war coincides with a sudden and brief increase in the air temperature to several million degrees in every city on the planet.

Yesterday marked the 72nd day of me doing this. I'm gunning for 72 trillion more.

Links and Stuff

Want to contribute?

RSS Feed

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can, thank you.


Resources For Understanding The War Beyond The Bulletins


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map, who is an independent youtuber with a mostly neutral viewpoint.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have good analysis (though also a couple bad takes here and there)

Understanding War and the Saker: neo-conservative sources but their reporting of the war (so far) seems to line up with reality better than most liberal sources.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict and, unlike most western analysts, has some degree of understanding on how war works. He is a reactionary, however.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent journalist reporting in the Ukrainian warzones.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ Gleb Bazov, banned from Twitter, referenced pretty heavily in what remains of pro-Russian Twitter.

https://t.me/asbmil ~ ASB Military News, banned from Twitter.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday Patrick Lancaster - crowd-funded U.S journalist, mostly pro-Russian, works on the ground near warzones to report news and talk to locals.

https://t.me/riafan_everywhere ~ Think it's a government news org or Federal News Agency? Russian language.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ Front news coverage. Russian langauge.

https://t.me/rybar ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

With the entire western media sphere being overwhelming pro-Ukraine already, you shouldn't really need more, but:

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Yesterday's discussion post.


  • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]
    hexagon
    ·
    2 years ago

    Unanswered phones, missed signals: fear of accidental US-China crisis grows SCMP

    “The escalation risk is significantly higher than it was 2001,” said Amanda Hsiao, an analyst with the International Crisis Group and author of Risky Competition: Strengthening US-China Crisis Management, which was released this month. “We saw then a period of political stalemate and tension, about 11 days before a breakthrough emerged. Were something like that to happen today, it would take much more than 11 days to resolve.”

    ...

    And while the odds of an unintended war remain small, the risk is growing, as communication and crisis management falter, guardrails disappear and more ships, planes and submarines crowd China’s periphery. Adding to the mix, the two nuclear powers increasingly frame their competitive struggle as a contest between democracy and authoritarianism, making it far tougher to compromise.

    ...

    Badly frayed relations mean that existing machinery designed to prevent the two giants from sliding into crisis, or helping them defuse one once under way – including hotlines, maritime guidelines, formal and informal diplomatic channels and military protocols – are increasingly ineffective or non-existent.

    And while the US side sees China as a rule-breaker bent on upending the global “rules-based” order, Beijing views the US as a washed-up superpower intent on humiliating China and preventing its rise.

    “People are worried about an accident because everyone’s on such a hair trigger,” said Susan Thornton, a senior fellow at Yale Law School and former senior State Department official. “It’s kind of amazing we’ve gone since 2001 without one.”

    ...

    Contact between the PLA and the Pentagon has been on a steady decline. The high-level Security and Diplomatic Dialogue, established in 2017 by president Donald Trump’s administration before relations deteriorated, was abandoned in 2019.

    Last year, US Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin tried and failed three times to organise military talks with General Xu Qiliang, vice-chairman of China’s Central Military Commission. Chinese state-run media accused Austin of ignoring diplomatic protocol by failing to request a meeting with his civilian counterpart, Defence Minister Wei Fenghe.

    Combine this with the news that Russia and the US are pulling out most of their diplomats and aren't returning each other's calls and that there aren't really any methods of reliable contact anymore between them, and it starts becoming very worrying for if a serious emergency hits. I have always assumed that if there really was a serious situation that could evolve into nuclear armageddon, that cooler heads would prevail and go "Wait, wait, we're not gonna sacrifice everything just for this temporary thing." I thought that was the lesson of the Cuban Missile Crisis. But our politicians and diplomats are incompetent failchildren who are getting increasingly unable to even run the empire efficiently, and they're pissing off their adversaries with deliberate sore spots, like US politicians going to Taiwan, so that they don't want to talk to them. Very dangerous stuff.

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Adding to the mix, the two nuclear powers increasingly frame their competitive struggle as a contest between democracy and authoritarianism, making it far tougher to compromise.

      China increasingly frames it this way? Press X to doubt.

      Why can’t westerners criticize their own nations without doing “both sides” projection?

      • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        :I-was-saying: ...even though I don't know what authoritarianism means.

        :yes-hahaha-yes-l:

        :sicko-pog:

        • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          They officially don’t frame it as oppositional at all. The official CPC line is that China is minding its own business, developing itself peacefully and going their own way. They don’t have any “clash of civilizations” narrative driving them like the West does.

          The extent to which the Chinese are hostile to the West is based on how aggressive the West acts towards them in preventing their development. They are starting to see the West as forces opposing their own peaceful rise instead of neutral trade partners, but there’s no big official Chinese state narratives about the evil US empire (at least not yet)

          • EthicalHumanMeat [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Well, they have recently been favorably comparing their "whole-process democracy" to America's sham democracy, and they do talk shit about America's crimes pretty frequently on all the state media I follow. Although it's usually tit for tat.

            • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
              ·
              2 years ago

              They are slowly being forced into a more hostile stance against the West, due to the West’s aggression towards them. The main way that it gets expressed currently is either “taking the high road” or doing hypocrisy-owns on the West diplomatically, which is much different than the West’s policies of sabotage, sanctions, coup attempts, funding fabricated smear campaigns (like the Uighur genocide narrative), etc.

              • EthicalHumanMeat [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Yeah, obviously it's just in response to western aggression, but they definitely have increasingly been going after the west as undemocratic, oppressive, warmongering, etc. Remember those reports they put out about human rights violations in the United States? The article's just wrong in its framing, implying that it's mutual aggression versus one-sided aggression from the west and China defending themselves.

                • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Those are the “hypocrisy-owns” I spoke of. China is basically just using the western narrative and flipping it, using it against the west as a “nut uh” to negate Western criticisms. It doesn’t really signify anything greater about China’s ruling ideology or how they frame geopolitics, it’s merely a turnabout