Yes, creeps can imagine creep things, but having access and availability of pedo treats both normalizes their cravings and in many cases places them on a hedonic treadmill where they need bigger "hits" for the same effect.
Almost every convicted pedophile started with child porn first.
I'd rather not have the hedonic treadmill/normalization debate all over again, though. I've done this song and dance before it comes down to "nuh uh, uh huh, nuh uh, uh huh" so I'll pass and let you believe what you want to believe. :wall-talk:
I’ve done this song and dance before it comes down to “nuh uh, uh huh, nuh uh, uh huh” so I’ll pass and let you believe what you want to believe.
it's not like any study could pass even neoliberal IRB standards of ethics and any non-raping pedos aren't going to talk to your random phone survey so this doesn't seem like the kind of thing we can make rigorous conclusions about.
It's a weird hill for you to fight on in particular, in my opinion. I already said I'd rather not continue this exchange because you've already went to the "nuh uh" with a preemptive rejection of any sources I would have otherwise cited. :wall-talk:
Yes, creeps can imagine creep things, but having access and availability of pedo treats both normalizes their cravings and in many cases places them on a hedonic treadmill where they need bigger "hits" for the same effect.
Almost every convicted pedophile started with child porn first.
I'd rather not have the hedonic treadmill/normalization debate all over again, though. I've done this song and dance before it comes down to "nuh uh, uh huh, nuh uh, uh huh" so I'll pass and let you believe what you want to believe. :wall-talk:
it's not like any study could pass even neoliberal IRB standards of ethics and any non-raping pedos aren't going to talk to your random phone survey so this doesn't seem like the kind of thing we can make rigorous conclusions about.
It's a weird hill for you to fight on in particular, in my opinion. I already said I'd rather not continue this exchange because you've already went to the "nuh uh" with a preemptive rejection of any sources I would have otherwise cited. :wall-talk:
that wasn't a "nuh uh" and i'm not fighting. I don't have a strong opinion, I just said why i don't.
:zizek-ok: