Basically, NY Magazine just put out an article essentially defending a 17-year old boy that leaked his girlfriend's nudes and blames the victim and her friends for making a list of boys to avoid at their high school.

Link to tweet: https://mobile.twitter.com/NYMag/status/1539219557285502977

Please go dunk on this.

  • Notcontenttobequiet [he/him]
    hexagon
    ·
    2 years ago

    I tend to agree. And I think my problem ultimately comes down to why publish this in the first place? What was the author trying to accomplish? Between the creepy prose and the victim blaming it just felt like leaving the situation alone would have been the best thing to do.

    And I'm sure similar situations have been occurring all over the US since smart phones have become common place. Maybe even before that.

    • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      it so clearly would be, except these kinds of high school dramas are symbolic for the media class. they see a child being rightly rejected by his peers for anti-social, predatory behavior and think "wait, these kids are going to be our coworkers in 5 to 10 years, and then what will they do to us?"