• geikei [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    No he isnt, especially for anything outside of America. The fact that he is a better source and analyst for domestic issues from a socdem angle makes his state department propagandistic foreign policy takes all the more dangerous cause even left leaning people trust him and put their "against msm" defenses down

      • CTHlurker [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        His SocDem-ish analysis of some of America's domestic issues are a decent starting point. It's just that he doesn't ever really propose solutions to any of the problems beyond "vote democrat and maybe they'll help". I was kind of in the same boat, I used to watch his show pretty regularly whenever they uploaded something, but stopped when I realized that he has some horrendous ideas about the rest of the world.

        Which leads me to the following thought: John Oliver is only ever as good as his writers and his researchers, and if they have an implicit trust in other american media-orgs, and rely partly on state department directions, then his episode is going to be filled with :brainworms: Keep in mind that this is an extremely charitable take/explanation for why his episodes have so many brainworms, and there is a pretty good case to be made that even if there is 0 intent to be state propaganda, he still should be treated like a state department spokesperson based on the material outcome of his actions.

      • FrogDog [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yeah, he helped radicalize me too. He's very good at pointing out problems and Lenin is good at offering solutions. A perfect pair