Permanently Deleted

  • FidelCastro [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Ah, I figured out the game.

    Step 1: Get red fash anarcho tankies to argue China’s drug prohibition is understandable

    Step 2: Argue with them about Amerika’s war on drugs as if they somehow support that.

    Step 3: Try to flip it on them by connecting the two.

    :very-intelligent: “The ol’ :reddit-logo: switcheroooo”

    Step 4: Shit and fard out of their doo doo ass while they crank one out in a corner like a goddamn swamp rat.

    :fidel-sarcastic:

    The whole “OP asks bait question and then goes silent as they jump to alts or set off a struggle sesh” move is completely flaccid at this point.

    Truly the best and brightest minds of their generation.

    Edit: OP had an early post removed titled “There are still suicide nets for abused workers in China. What's China doing to end these working conditions?” so yeah, I called it. they’re some kind of weird :reddit-logo: mutant.

    • Fishroot [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      tbh i don't see it that way, Regardless i think the subject is a good way to initiate a smart and constructive discussion on the laws a country apply due to values and historical event that happened, but also on the consequences of the law application

      • FidelCastro [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I’ve already outlined in other replies why I think the post starts from a place of chauvinism, but perhaps.

        I’ve just seen this same pattern play out on repeat a number of times lol

        Edit: op already had another post removed earlier about “zomg teh evil ccp suicide nets” so I called it, they’re a reddit*r

        • DJMSilver [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          This is the real intent behind all drug related questions. There has to be a deconstruction of what a 'drug' is before any serious conversation can start. Don't buy into the "I just really want to talk about drugs but I'm scared of some totalitarian regime that will take it away", the framing of the question itself should be rejected.

          • FidelCastro [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            exactly. not all conversations are worth having, especially if the person who put forward the question is some fuckheaded chauvinist