The leftist president has said his measures benefit consumers, while critics counter they raise costs, undermine investment and are unfair to international companies.
NOOOOO NOT THE INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES!!! YOU DIDNT THINK ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL COMPANIES :wojak-nooo:
That's why I said "attempt," though I think Mexico would be a very interesting case because of it having such a huge land border with the US, which would surely make smuggling supplies to the backed faction much easier than in previous failures like in Venezuela (where "aid" that was military equipment got intercepted).
I think US intelligence finally understands that the risk of botching a coup outweighs the benefits of even entertaining the idea. Even if you oust the guy, you still need to make sure your sponsored replacement puppet can be put in and cement his power quickly. Else, you create a power vacuum which can snowball into an widespread economic disruption. Then you have to consider ramifications with foreign relations.
Take Libya and Syria for example. Sure, the US might have benefited in the short term by making an example out of them and getting some resources out of it but in the long term? They ended up catalyzing the creation of the opposing pole, like China, Russia and Iran along with other countries who realize they might be on the cross hairs one day on the whim of Washington. Especially in Libya's case where Gaddafi did everything he could to appease the West and they shoved a knife through his rectum for the trouble. To say nothing of the long-term ramifications in all aspects of both events, like the refugee crisis.
That makes sense, I'm just worried about flailing, especially if Trump wins again or something and then the decisions, while not totally unconstrained, will be much less reasonable in terms of realpolitik.
Yeah sorry didn't mean to imply I didn't agree, just staving off my own doomer pangs with a reminder about the collapsing empire
That's a good point though about the land border
deleted by creator