So I saw this list talking about the 10 richest people of Humanity listing a certain someone among their ranks as the fifth wealthiest man in all of history. Why do these bourgeoise clowns decide to equate the sum worth of an individual man with the total wealth of a nation is beyond me, besides :liberalism: :brainworms: So lets go over some known facts at humanity's 5th most richest person in all of history that even makes Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and Elon Musk all combined look like tiny wheat grains in Stalin's comically oversized golden spoon of wealth.

The reality is that Stalin didn’t have a $7.5 trillion dollar worth nor a zero net worth. Contrary to "popular" belief, he was very averse to opulence and preferred professional settings in interiors as well as having an austere wardrobe. As a communist, as you can probably infer, he hated boogie shit like all the glittery gold glam or rare expensive shit you'd see in other world leaders workplaces or residences.

He was also a salaryman, with a monthly salary of 10,000 rubles (roughly 2,500 dollars if we're using the 5th Soviet Ruble to dollar exchange rate) with an immediate expenditure in party dues paid of 300 rubles (75 dollars) every single month. He did in fact earn enough to stash some money in a bank account. He was also paid for writing books and articles but exact amount is not known for sure. It is also known that a lot of his money went to fund contest prizes, science fairs, writing exhibitions, and his family being his mother, his children and his grandchildren.

He had access to all of the party vehicles to use at his disposal (although he never owned any of them) and he also had the right to use all governmental residences across the USSR and lived in some of them. The key word here is that he never owned them, the State did. All those things were available to him as a party official. Thus after his death his family did not inherit them any property or vehicles and they were all used for other Party officials in the future as they were state property.

At his death, all his worldly possessions amounted to his party card, his payment of dues card, a few rubles, some blank letters pre-stamped with his name, a few sets of clothes, a letter blotter tool, his small collection of tobacco pipes, some tea cups, gifts from comrades ranging from type-writing devices to Chinese paintings, and his personal treasure trove - his library of some 25,000 books.

Too long, didn't read? You probably should but here's the summary: Dude's not rich but lived a comfortable life.

  • Des [she/her, they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    been listening to blowback recently and hearing american newsmen referred to the "soviet dictator" and stuff back then. did the soviet union ever straight up refute that? be like: ok so we'll call your president the american dictator. i mean he was basically a popular wartime (internally?) elected chief executive correct?

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      I believe a lot of the rhetoric of the wartime referred to him as either the grand Marshal or the premier of the Soviet Union. Not too sure about the pre-war, but post-war was when they dialed up the propaganda to smear the very concept socialist states were democratic.

      • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
        ·
        2 years ago

        pre-war was still bad, theres a 'honeymoon' of detente where the west said positive things about the Soviets but it was all of 4 years

      • Des [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        yeah i looked up some wartime pro-soviet propaganda and the shift was so intense it was like whiplash.

    • Thomas_Dankara [any,comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      soviet union didn't refute it but you know who did? The CIA.

      i've show this to libs before and had them say, without a hint of irony, "oh so you just believe what the CIA says?"

      YES, I BELIEVE THEIR DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS BECAUSE NOBODY EVER REPORTS ON THEM

      IT'S THEIR LIMITED HANGOUTS WITH THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA THAT I REFUSE TO TAKE AT FACE VALUE AND WHICH YOU BASTARDS SINCERELY LAP UP LIKE THIRSTY DOGS :monke-rage:

    • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
      ·
      2 years ago

      (internally?)

      its slightly oblique but no more so than fucking PMs in all the DemocraticTM parliaments the world round. party votes internally, selects members to the higher offices, its not that weird until a country is working against capital and then its dictatorship.

      • Des [she/her, they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        i always forget in parliamentary systems you are voting for the party not the person

        • solaranus
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I am an AnCap Stalinist and I love Joseph Stalin because he was the world's greatest job creator.