Isn't it statiscally more likely that the professor had to argue with a Paleo-Conservative who believed most of the State department atrocity propaganda and was arguing that Putin was a based nationalist, that China was based for killing all the Uighyrs, or that political dissidents in general should be killed on sight for promoting the-d-word.
I wonder why the professor felt the need to include this in their syllabus. Did they argue with communist students in previous semesters? lol
Definitely got publicly owned by a student who's read their theory
Isn't it statiscally more likely that the professor had to argue with a Paleo-Conservative who believed most of the State department atrocity propaganda and was arguing that Putin was a based nationalist, that China was based for killing all the Uighyrs, or that political dissidents in general should be killed on sight for promoting the-d-word.