:soypoint-1: :mao-wave: :soypoint-2:
but without even a little bit of irony
Lab Member 001: Time-leap machines and time machines should never be built! Even if you can figure out how to do it, you should never ever build one!
Lab Member 004: If I don't do something, you'll vanish. You will never have existed... I have no choice but to change the past!
Lab Member 001: And what if you fail? What if it doesn't go well? The answer is simple. You do it again. You keep going back to the past until you succeed. As long as they have the means to go back in time, that's what people will do.
Lab Member 001: But it'll only increase the suffering. A change in the past will always affect something else. It will never change in a way that's convenient for you. If you save someone, you will lose someone... Dreams you finally fulfilled won't exist anymore. Your long-held desires will be snatched away, eradicated... and when the change you hoped for doesn't happen, you will have to keep facing that inescapable reality again and again, again and again!
Lab Member 001: Do you realize the pain of continuously repeating all of that while bearing the responsibility for all of those losses? Do you understand the fear of losing your humanity after it wears you down?
Lab Member 004: But...
Lab Member 001: Even if you have the means, the past must not be changed. You must not turn chance into reality.
Lab Member 001: No one knows the future. It's because the past cannot be undone that people can accept all sorts of pain, adversity, and cruel accidents, yet still move forward.
Lab Member 004: The what are you going to do, 001? You're going to disappear! I... I saw it... A world where you don't exist. A lab with only 002, 003, and me... Where nobody remembers you... It was crueler than death! Any mark or meaning of your existence will disappear!
Lab Member 001: ...I don't care
Actualy Mao was the better orator so if its to visit a speech he would be more hype
From famous communist leaders in order of best at speeches to worst id imagine it would go:
Lenin=Castro>Mao>Stalin
And I wouldn't understand any of em :gigachad-hd:
"Privyet" and "ni hao" is the best i can do
Stalin's honest, straightforward, and to-the-point speeches are among the best in the world given by national leaders. It has the most minimal fluff or flowery language in it that many orators use to take up record space. It directly conveys the needed message efficiently, laying out the facts and the tasks to be done to accomplish objectives with minimalist flourish. That's of course my objective position on making tier lists of orators.
I've heard that Lenin was not actually a very good public orator
idk in the available vids his body language seems top tier and a couple of speeches (audio) that have survived seem pretty succint and energized and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rj7iRwzX-A0
Apparently the original was with Hitler
:LIB:: What’s the difference?
At first I was shocked Mr. Lovenstein was based, then I noticed it was a different art style…
I need someone I understand, and I know JUST THE PERSON AND JUST THE PLACE
:parenti-hands: (no yellow Parenti emotes? smh this is why the left will never win)
