It's wild that no one reads the manifesto. It's less than 100 pages and immediately debunks 99% of criticism I've seen.
I guess I know a lot of people who are seemingly afraid to read communist literature because they think it has some sort of brainwashing effect or something. Some just say "nah, I don't need to read that, I probably agree with a lot of it but just not the specifics" without ever actually trying to read.
You can get a really good grasp on communism and basically all theory with like 300 pages of text. The Manifesto, State and Rev, and BSAR. All together like 350 pages.
but i agree entirely because ive only read the manifesto & state and revolution, and even those two alone gave me a really good grasp on marxist concepts .. if i didnt have adhd and like a lotta fucked up shit going on with my head id try my hand at das kapital , but its just not the time for me to try
maybe ill get into parenti or something,. his lectures rule so im guessing his writing is just as good.. obviouslynot "theory" though
BSAR is less about communism and more about understanding anti-communism in the west. The most important concept that Parenti introduces in that book IMO is that anti-communism in western countries isn't like a political belief people have because they believe in it, it's more like a religious dogma that everyone has to adhere to in order to be taken seriously in the western political climate.
I think reading them in that order is good because the first establishes the goals, the second shows an example of conditions and form of a successful revolution, and the third shows the societal conditions of the modern working class and the continuance of centuries old tautology that's hurled against struggles for liberation.
Parenti is an important tool for understanding the tools developed after the Russian revolution and the global wars to subjugate and destroy Communist organizing. Kinda like a safety manual for effective organizing in the late 20th/21st centuries.
Also you can get a copy of Borchart's The People's Marx for free on the archive. There are also quite a few Modern Library reprints floating around (check your local/state library system for it, under Capital and Other Writings (Modern Library #202)).
because they think it has some sort of brainwashing effect or something.
Unironically yes, because of how leftist literature differs greatly from the cartoonish picture reactionary concocted of them. Trying to read Capital and got absolutely fucked by the dry-ass economic treatise genuinely dewormed my brain. I cannot get past the part about diamonds yet reading just how thought-out Marx actually is in contrast to the slander of him as the "free stuff" guy.
It's wild that no one reads the manifesto. It's less than 100 pages and immediately debunks 99% of criticism I've seen.
I guess I know a lot of people who are seemingly afraid to read communist literature because they think it has some sort of brainwashing effect or something. Some just say "nah, I don't need to read that, I probably agree with a lot of it but just not the specifics" without ever actually trying to read.
deleted by creator
You can get a really good grasp on communism and basically all theory with like 300 pages of text. The Manifesto, State and Rev, and BSAR. All together like 350 pages.
BSAR? (ill probably remember whatbthis means the second i hit the "reply" button and feel like a stupid Ass,but be too lazy to delete this comment )
:parenti:
Blackshirts and Reds
Don't forget Socialism: Utopian and Scientific
but i agree entirely because ive only read the manifesto & state and revolution, and even those two alone gave me a really good grasp on marxist concepts .. if i didnt have adhd and like a lotta fucked up shit going on with my head id try my hand at das kapital , but its just not the time for me to try
maybe ill get into parenti or something,. his lectures rule so im guessing his writing is just as good.. obviouslynot "theory" though
BSAR is less about communism and more about understanding anti-communism in the west. The most important concept that Parenti introduces in that book IMO is that anti-communism in western countries isn't like a political belief people have because they believe in it, it's more like a religious dogma that everyone has to adhere to in order to be taken seriously in the western political climate.
I think reading them in that order is good because the first establishes the goals, the second shows an example of conditions and form of a successful revolution, and the third shows the societal conditions of the modern working class and the continuance of centuries old tautology that's hurled against struggles for liberation.
deleted by creator
Parenti is an important tool for understanding the tools developed after the Russian revolution and the global wars to subjugate and destroy Communist organizing. Kinda like a safety manual for effective organizing in the late 20th/21st centuries.
Also you can get a copy of Borchart's The People's Marx for free on the archive. There are also quite a few Modern Library reprints floating around (check your local/state library system for it, under Capital and Other Writings (Modern Library #202)).
There also seems to be another edition by a different editor on the MIA too
Good for a primer on Capital
Americans have trouble with literacy
deleted by creator
Unironically yes, because of how leftist literature differs greatly from the cartoonish picture reactionary concocted of them. Trying to read Capital and got absolutely fucked by the dry-ass economic treatise genuinely dewormed my brain. I cannot get past the part about diamonds yet reading just how thought-out Marx actually is in contrast to the slander of him as the "free stuff" guy.