The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is the largest of the true foxes and one of the most widely distributed members of the order Carnivora, being present across the entire Northern Hemisphere including most of North America, Europe and Asia, plus parts of North Africa. It is listed as least concern on the IUCN Red List. Its range has increased alongside human expansion, having been introduced to Australia, where it is considered harmful to native mammals and bird populations. Due to its presence in Australia, it is included on the list of the "world's 100 worst invasive species".
The red fox originated from smaller-sized ancestors from Eurasia during the Middle Villafranchian period, and colonised North America shortly after the Wisconsin glaciation. Among the true foxes, the red fox represents a more progressive form in the direction of carnivory. Apart from its large size, the red fox is distinguished from other fox species by its ability to adapt quickly to new environments. Despite its name, the species often produces individuals with other colourings, including leucistic and melanistic individuals. Forty-five subspecies are currently recognised,[7] which are divided into two categories: the large northern foxes and the small, basal southern grey desert foxes of Asia and North Africa.
Red foxes are usually found in pairs or small groups consisting of families, such as a mated pair and their young, or a male with several females having kinship ties. The young of the mated pair remain with their parents to assist in caring for new kits.[8] The species primarily feeds on small rodents, though it may also target rabbits, squirrels, game birds, reptiles, invertebrates and young ungulates. Fruit and vegetable matter is also eaten sometimes. Although the red fox tends to kill smaller predators, including other fox species, it is vulnerable to attack from larger predators, such as wolves, coyotes, golden jackals, large predatory birds such as golden eagles and Eurasian eagle owls, and medium- and large-sized felids.
The species has a long history of association with humans, having been extensively hunted as a pest and furbearer for many centuries, as well as being represented in human folklore and mythology. Because of its widespread distribution and large population, the red fox is one of the most important furbearing animals harvested for the fur trade. Too small to pose a threat to humans, it has extensively benefited from the presence of human habitation, and has successfully colonised many suburban and urban areas. Domestication of the red fox is also underway in Russia, and has resulted in the domesticated silver fox.
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- 📀 Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 🔥 Read and talk about a current topics in the News Megathread
- ⚔ Come talk in the New Weekly PoC thread
- ✨ Talk with fellow Trans comrades in the New Weekly Trans thread
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
Theory:
Man, I just saw this AI advertised on Twitter as an AI to write a book. It's called "Claude-Author." You pay them $10, send in your prompt, and they send back an AI generated novel plus cover.
I genuinely don't think AI will supplant people when it comes to making art. Maybe some artists will use AI and then edit the result, but at the end of the day AI output is boring. There's a good Ursula Le Guin quote about lifeless derivative fantasy books that I think applies here, "Commodified fantasy takes no risks: it invents nothing, but imitates and trivialises... What the commodifiers of fantasy count on and exploit is the insuperable imagination of the reader, child or adult, which gives even these dead things life--of a sort, for a while." I'd say AI is like the logical extreme of these commodifiers. And maybe some people will be excited by AI for a little while, but I really think in the end it's output will be so dull that no one will want it.
The one arena I could see AI taking over entirely, if it hasn't already, is the Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP) market. But even then, for those high-volume readers, I might be doing them a disservice in thinking they would go for AI slop.
Anyway, I doubt that "Claude-Author" is the best AI has to offer, but they had some sample novels on their page, and I just thought the technology was going to be more impressive than that. One, their "novel" probably wasn't even 10,000 words. And it only had coherence in the loosest possible terms. Like, character traits, names, and the plot and their role in it, managed to be consistent. Barely. And that was probably because there were only four named characters in the whole thing. Even on my cruelest day, voicing my worst thoughts about the reading public, I would not believe that any human being would enjoy reading content generated by this program.
I got that Le Guin quote from this Reddit thread, it's from a forward to Tales of Earthsea that came out in 2001.
oh man that's a good scam
If you're using fantasy for a 1:1 ratio of reading a thing to creating a mental image then I guess AI would work for you. The good shit is more than the sum of its parts. It's like the difference between a portrait study at your community college and the Mona Lisa. If Nintendo was an AI company, tears of the kingdom would have been 6 more dungeons because Ganondorf is back up to trouble instead of letting you construct vehicles in the sky and underground.
Good fantasy has a certain spice in the way that it makes you reconsider yourself and the things around you. Dark Academia isn't just about portraits of libraries. In Infinity Alchemy it's a chance to think about class and what happens when reputation precedes you. If the magic was just non-descript fireballs out of wands and drinking coffee I would have dropped it. Even if you're an amateur writer like me doing a lot of description, picking coagulated imagiogen out of sleeping people's dreams as a reagent for practical applications involving floating makes some intuitive sense.
It's discouraging and another symptom in the same vein as Disney slop, capeshit, and live action remakes. It's financers and people looking for profit making cultural products. It's not inspiring
A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.