Coca_Cola_but_Commie [he/him]

  • 40 Posts
  • 2.18K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2020

help-circle

  • My reading has declined as I've aged, generally, and the number of books I want to read is expanding exponentially with each passing day (and the rate at which I buy books that pile up unread is a within striking distance of being a problem. I'm a pack-rat by nature and always have been however it's becoming a bit much but also I'll never be able to resell or give away a book I bought and then didn't read. What if I get around to reading i some day? For instance I subscribed to a fiction magazine in 2018, read two of the issues. The rest are sandwiched in the middle of a pile of books which I also haven't read and have been sitting on the corner of my desk since at least 2018) so most of my re-reading was something I did as a teenager.

    I also established a habit in those years that continues to this day. As a teenager I loved Harry Potter. I probably read all the physical books twice. But I owned all the audiobooks (at that time on cassette) narrated by Jim Dale and I listened to those many times. I have no idea how many. I might've listened to the whole series ten times (except Deathly Hollows, which I never owned as a physical audiobook, and I think I read it once at release and then listened to it on audible a few years later). The only other books I can remember re-reading during this time was Brian Jacques (of Redwall fame) Castaways of the Flying Dutchman trilogy, and Nancy Farmer's YA Norse mythology-inspired Fantasy series Sea of Trolls. I guess I read and re-read some of R.A Salvatore's Forgotten Realms novels. Probably a few others along the same line that I'm forgetting now.

    In my 20s my favorite books were still fantasy, but now they were Glen Cook's The Black Company then-nine-book series (now ten books) of '80s-'90s trippy dark military fantasy and Joe Abercrombie's then-six-book The First Law series of '00s cynical dark heroic fantasy (now ten books). I've only actually read each of these once. But I like the audiobook narrators for each series, so I've listened to each at least three times.

    The one outlier is ASOIAF. I'd read most of the books as a teenager (A Dance With Dragons wasn't out yet). Then after the show ended I re-read the books. It probably helps that I can't stand the narrator of those books, the late Roy Dotrice. Though Harry Lloyd, who played Daenerys's brother Viserys in season one of GOT, read Martin's A Knight of the Seven Kingdom novella series, and he's very good. I guess I've re-read that one too, in that I've read it and listened to the audiobook.





  • That’s the awkward thing about this. I’ve got a pre-built, so the motherboard is special made for the PC building companies. In my case it’s the ASROCK B450M pro4s/ac.

    If it’s the same as the consumer model(B450M pro4/AC, no s) then it has a max of 128 GB RAM, which must mean up to 32 GB per slot. But has cyperpowerpc decided to fuck me? Haven’t been able to find any manual or any info online. Kept the box all these years but they didn’t include a manual anyway.

    Edit: also I want to put in an M.2 SSD but I can’t tell if the port on my motherboard is for a SATA III connection or a PCIe gen 3 connection. Most consumer models of B450s seem to either have a gen 3 or a gen 3 plus a SATA. On the pictures on ASROCK’s websites gen 3’s are labeled with a sticker that reads ULTRA M.2 and SATA’s aren’t. Mine has no sticker. But that could just be their mockup and not what real ones look like. It’s possible that it’s printed on the Motherboard itself, but if that’s the case it would be underneath the CPU fan which I don’t want to remove. Might try to buy a gen 3 and just return it if it doesn’t work. But online returns always make me nervous, if they are refused for some reason then I’m left in the lurch.


  • Can my motherboard take any RAM so long as the speed and type is compatible?

    Right now my PC has one stick of 8 GB 3000 MHz DDR4 RAM. Can I buy and slot in any stick of 3000 MHz DDR4 RAM? Does it have to be the same capacity, or can I buy 2 x 16 sticks and bring myself up to 40 GB of RAM? Or could I buy the new stuff, remove my old stick, and just have 32 GB? What about brand, does that matter?

    I can’t buy more of the existing model of RAM stick because they’re out of stock everywhere.

    I know this isn’t really the forum for this question and I should find a PC building subreddit to ask this. But I find the thought of entering a den of technomancers only to reveal my fundamental ignorance about their trade to be quite intimidating.


  • I’m enjoying seeing chud dipshits complaining that Witcher 4 is woke because woman protagonist. I just love it when people complain “now the Witcher has gone woke.” I saw similar complaints with 3, saying they’d given in to woke (probably still using SJW back then) when compared to 1. And of course people complaining about the Witcher show’s race blind casting (I also don’t like the show but that’s just because every clip I’ve seen from it makes it look poorly designed, produced, acted, and written). But if you read the books Sapkowski is not subtle about his feminist worldview. He’ll basically have characters address the reader and say “women should have access to abortion and contraceptives. No one should ever beremovedd. Look, over there, a woman of equal athletic prowess to her male peers.” The lodge of sorceresses are all manipulative schemers. But the sorcerers are all worse. The big bad is literally a sorcerer who decides to run a eugenics program on women he’s captured and imprisoned and he is killed with prejudice for it. One of his first short stories is a dark feminist retelling of the original Sleeping Beauty folktale. I’m not even saying his portrayal of women is flawless (Geralt is clearly, usually, a stand-in for Sapkowski’s view. Also nearly every woman he meets really wants to fuck him) but I would say one of the biggest themes of the Witcher books are that men and women should be equals, that male violence against woman is a horror, that women are kept from the tools they need to resist that violence and oppression by patriarchal systems of control, and that women should seize these systems and use them against their oppressors.




  • I'm not a complicated man. Witcher IV good.

    however

    I'm mildly disappointed to see that Ciri will be the protag and continuing her path of Witchering. Mostly because my favorite ending to The Witcher III is Ciri accepting her role as Empress. I like this enging for several reasons, some sounder than others, mostly based in pedantic lore nonsense. One, it's fairly well established that Witchering is a miserable way to spend your life, even if you happen to have a few dear companions like Geralt does. Two, there are less and less monsters in the world all the time. Half the reason there are so few Witchers during the decades in which the books/games is because they didn't need to bother rebuilding the Witcher Order after it was mostly destroyed sixty years before the first book because there are so few monsters. It's established, I can't remember if it's book canon or game canon or both, that women can't undergo the mutations that create witchers superhuman reflexes and resistance to toxins because they were designed by callous mages with only boys in mind (and it kills most of them anyway). CDPR will have to have some answer as to why Ciri is drinking Witcher brews and moving supernaturally. Also it renders the subject infertile, so if Ciri's feudal claims are going to be brought up in any way that'll be important. Not implausible questions to answer, lore wise.

    Now given that the games establish distinct Witcher schools I imagined we might play as some other Witcher, maybe in some far flung corner of that world. Because I think, assuming this game is going to be about Ciri as a Witcher, they've missed a more interesting story. I'd much rather play a game focused around political intrigue as Empress Ciri. Which I think fits with the books because it seemed to me that Sapkowski got bored with his own premise around book three and wanted to write a sweeping political epic instead, falling back on his strengths as a short story writer to do so. And then every once in awhile we'd get a chapter of Geralt or Ciri doing something less interesting than whatever political aside we just went on. Granted, people would probably be upset if a game called Witcher IV didn't have any monster hunting in it (even though there's very little monster hunting in Geralt's books, which I've always thought was funny) but it'd be easy to do a dual protagonist situation. Ciri for the big political intrigue, and some lone Witcher who sees the repercussions of actions taken during the intrigue out in the real world.

    I'd rather they left the franchise alone, Witcher III is a great game and a great capstone on the entire Witcher Saga if you take the books and the games as a whole. Making Witcher IV and making it be about Ciri as a witcher just feels like they can only end up making The Witcher III again but worse, because you can't ever go back and recapture what was. Not counting the mobile games and digital card/boardgames I've played every game that CDPR has put out and I've liked every one of them, so I'm tentatively hopeful that the Witcher 1 remake and this Witcher IV game will be better than I'm imagining.

    Also the cinematic trailer for IV is just the Witcher III "Killing Monsters" trailer but longer and starring Ciri.



  • Only mentioning it because it was cited on Wikipedia, but a former SEAL named Jocko Willick has a version online, which is just embarrassing. I won't link it here. I might even give the thumb looking motherfucker his due (though he's quite obviously heard Holmes's reading and is doing a worse version of it) but the video is titled "the most INTENSE poem ever" and it's got this awful background suspenseful music. Truly a mediocre effort from some asshole who spent most of his life murdering Iraqi civilians and has spent the last 14 years grifting. The guy's got a podcast, not super popular based on YouTube views, and in the last six days he's put out three episodes totaling nearly 8 hours.



  • there was some embezzlement thing where Brian defrauded 17M, Steven Hemsley (executive chariman) defrauded 102M, and Witty defrauded a few million. Brian was set to testify soon. Hemsley took home almost all of the money.

    I've been enjoying concocting farcical conspiracy scenarios in my mind since Luigi was collared. It's not so hard to imagine that he could've fallen down the gladio well. Easy to set him up as a patsy. But that also seems like an enormously risky move that, if you assume the powers that be don't know who the real shooter is, leaves them open to embarrassment. And if they do know who the real shooter is why bother creating a fake one? Seems like a lot of work, that could still backfire on them, when it all would've been forgotten about in a few weeks anyway. And the official line is believable. Promising kid from a rich family runs afoul of the health insurance industry, realizes his life will never be the same again, and decides to kill a guy for it. Escapes one of the most surveilled cities in the world as a result of police incompetence and some good planning on his part. Gets caught because a cop lives in the mind of every American over the age of 45.

    Anyway, I assume that Luigi is the guy, partly out of "nothing ever happens" brain and partly out of fear that a sophisticated gladio network could really exist, has existed other places in ways that are provable, but I want to believe it's all paranoid delusion, that the State couldn't really be that powerful, because that's too frightening to contemplate. There's that line you see skeptics trot out all the time with regard to conspiracy adjacent stuff, that conspiracy theorists are just looking to believe in something bigger than themselves that has control, because the random and chaotic nature of life can be too hard to take. I hope that's true of all the gladio shit.

    This insider trading case does give me pause, though. Suddenly, with that much money on the line, shit that I would normally think is impossible doesn't sound that farfetched.






  • Love this show to death but if I think too long about the both-sides politics I start to go crazy.

    Bizarre that when some of the Zaunites agree to fight alongside the topsiders to stop the techbro-dystopian/feudal-warlord alliance that's trying to bring about the apocalypse the Zaunites wear the uniform of the Enforcers, the local cops/occupying army that has killed and terrorized the Zaunites for- What? Centuries? At least decades. I could accept them fighting together to stave off a worse enemy, but as depicted I thought it was more than a little distasteful.

    It's just weird how often the show seems to expect viewers to have sympathy for Piltover's position when it's shown over and over that they are depriving the Zaunites of all dignity. It's at least implied that the generation before Vi and Jinx were born as a slave caste in mines underneath Piltover and narrowly won the precarious freedoms we see them with at the start of the show. Though I'm not entirely clear on the lore there.

    It's even reinforced in Episode 7 of Season 2 that in a world where Hextech never exists and also Heimerdinger gives even a little bit of a shit about the people of the Undercity that the entire situation is much much better, though nowhere near parity. But I'm supposed to feel bad that Jinx blew the council to hell?