Any analyses or interpretation of the declassified CIA documents should be left to reliable secondary sources, as required by Wikipedia's policies on original research: "Articles may make an analytic, evaluative, interpretive, or synthetic claim only if that has been published by a reliable secondary source."
So if none of the sources they consider reliable report on that, there's totally nothing they can do, their hands are tied. This is definitely how you write an unbiased encyclopedia.
From the talk page:
So if none of the sources they consider reliable report on that, there's totally nothing they can do, their hands are tied. This is definitely how you write an unbiased encyclopedia.
Jimmy Wales admires Ayn Rand