Thomas Bell, born on this day in 1882, was a Scottish socialist politician, trade unionist, and a founding member of the Communist Party of Great Britain. He said: "The Communist Party is nothing if it is not a party of realism".

Bell also worked as an editor for the Communist Party's magazine "Communist Review" and co-founded the Socialist Labour Party.

Thomas Bell was born in Parkhead, Glasgow to an irregularly employed stonemason and a mother who worked at home spinning cotton and silk. While working at a bottling shop, Bell became interested in atheism and labor politics, reading rationalist works by Ernst Haeckel and Thomas Huxley, as well as texts on evolution by Charles Darwin.

Bell joined the Independent Labour Party (ILP) in 1900, but would participate in more radical parties as his politics matured, including the Marxist Social Democratic Party and, later, the Socialist Labour Party.

In 1919, Bell was elected President of the Associated Ironmoulders, Secretary of the SLP and editor of its newspaper, "The Socialist". He sat on a unity committee, intending to negotiate for a single communist party with leaders of the British Socialist Party, Workers Socialist Federation and other socialist groups, but their proposals were repudiated by the SLP.

Resigning as Secretary, Bell helped found the Communist Unity Group, which became an original constituent of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB).

"The theory of getting a Labour government in order to get communism is as stilted as the Kautskyan idea that Russia should go through period of capitalist development under the democratic bourgeois institutions in preference to the Workers', Peasants' and Soldiers' dictatorship."

  • Thomas Bell

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes struggle sessions over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can go here nerd

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I was hanging out with my mom yesterday and I had the public radio station and during their talk show segment the main topic for the hour was "Are DWI laws too lax in texas" and my jaw hit the floor. The entire time just glowing and fanning over MADs work with cops and "other law-enforcement" to punish people for being behind the wheel.

    Bruh, not a single mention of the insane and unsustainable urban sprawl with infrequent and unpredictable access to public transit for commuters wanting to AVOID such things like drinking and driving. The guest's recommendation "uber home".

    I really wish people were more aware of the environment in which crime and other conditions occur. Maybe your direct material conditions influence the way you act and behave, and sometimes "taking personal responsibility" is not good enough advice. Idiots.

    • apersonofinterest [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      you are correct that we need to fix the material conditions that mean the only thing you can do to get anywhere is drive, but you're also a piece of shit if you drink and drive. it's personal as i've been hit on my bicycle by someone driving drunk. fuck drunk drivers

      • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, I 100% agree and I hardly go out to drink anymore and try to engage in moderation precisely to avoid that sort of tragedy. My complaint is that the status quo is not working. Giving more power to law enforcement (lol pigs; let's remember a lot of cops get busted for driving under the influence and their departments cover it up) and making DWI laws even harsher is just doubling down on ineffective policies. I'd much rather hear that there is an evening bus route for people coming from the downtown/midtown area. I'd rather see MAD force the city to subsidize cabfare and rideshare apps on holidays. Create a network of mutual aid to rideshare with designated drivers at the ready.

        The absurdity of the window in which the discourse is happening is what makes me upset. I think if we had all of these options available, and you still chose to drive drunk, then you deserve the book thrown at you. But the reality is that hundreds of thousands of people go out every night, get drunk, and drive home because my city - and many other cities in the country - suck absolute ass. And the threat of force is not doing anything about it.

      • marxisthayaca [he/him,they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I had a friend get run over by a pickup truck driver and he ended up in a coma. I hope you are fully recovered, that really fucking sucks.

        My wife and I had a scary near miss with a piece of shit that stopped in the middle of the highway on a rainy night and we almost got rear ended by another car.