arrow-up1158imagetitleHarryLime [any] to chapotraphouse • 8 months agomessage-square46 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]hexbear17·edit-28 months agoI don't know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer. link
minus-squareanarchoilluminati [comrade/them]hexbear14·8 months agoWhat if your metric is being terminally cum brained? link
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]hexbear14·8 months agothen start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there. link
I don't know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.
What if your metric is being terminally cum brained?
then start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.
deleted by creator