In regards to the DeBeers comment I agree, that's why I specified multiple times in capitalist control schemes there's almost zero reason to apply any of my reasoning, and mentioned that asteroid mining would only happen in the first place inside of one if they were able to fully monopolize and maintain said monopoly. Specifically, the entire rest of my message as stated multiple times is in defense of space and technology advancements in AES countries.

In regards to industrialization being the issue/"uncle ted" shit, do you apply this rhetoric to the development of China and the industrialization they've pursued to end extreme poverty etc? How about the pace at which they used technological advancements from capitalist societies to skip as much of the environmental damage of their industrialization and pace through it as rapidly as possible in order to deploy much cleaner more technologically advanced methods of manufacturing, energy production, etc. That exists under the present system. There is no "outside of this system" until it is destroyed, and there is no destroying this system without pursuing technological and industrial advantages in AES countries (with the goal of removing the economic/technological/cultural control global capitalist societies have because of their unipolar control of resources and global trade) and/or the destruction of key imperial core states by their proles. We will not hug away the carbon choking our planet as long as we all just dial back on the 'cool gadgets', or at least, good luck on convincing everyone to join you. That's been going real swell as the sole method by which we've been fighting climate change so far.

Idealism is of no real interest to me.