• zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Under communism I would love to see mobile lifestyles become more popular, especially since it means communities could share workers with specialized talents.

    I think there's plenty of value in low cost mobility. But I don't think migrant labor is really a good thing, from a socialist planning sense.

    You want people who are invested in the long term health and well-being of a community. You don't want Boom-Bust business cycles driven by hyper-exploitative economic activity (slash-and-burn farming, overfishing, strip mining, etc) that leave ghost towns in their wake.

    There should be real material benefits guaranteed to individuals, families, and organizations rooted in a given location and adding year-over-year value.

    Without some degree of long term incentive, you invite free-riders and fair weather friends who abandon your enclave the moment the global economy/local ecology turn.

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Oh, sure. Bringing veterans of an industry into an underdeveloped community adds tons of value.

        But only if they leave apprentices and journeymen in their wake.

    • bubbalu [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Any job that requires a large amount of training but is in low demand in any given area would need to be travelling to be efficient.

        • Nakoichi [they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Uhh lots of important and highly specialized jobs literally cannot be done "remotely".

          • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I'm trying to use my Meta Hands™ to fit these pipes, but they're too far away from the Meta Portal™ and Meta Legs™ haven't been invented yet.