• blight [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    she's an absolute content machine with crank characteristics

    • nine_leven [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yeah be careful around these parts with it, her source for AFP being a "propaganda multiplier" (which I agree with) is SWPRS (which has some good and bad takes on COVID-19 policy, some of the bad ones will get you banned here because you can't question big pharma's covid vaccines, and some are just bad like anti-lockdown stuff, and not anti-lockdown-the-way-most-of-the-west-did-it).

      • Nakoichi [they/them]M
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        some of the bad ones will get you banned here because you can’t question big pharma’s covid vaccines

        You mean the vaccines that were funded by the public and went through decades of rigorous science before the patents were sold off to be profited from?

        Yeah fuck off dude. okay sorry that was needlessly hostile it's a sensitive subject since my mom is a big time anti-vaxxer and you sounded just like her.

        They aren't "big pharma's vaccines" they are ours and they were stolen from us.

          • cawsby [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Eh, sometimes the medicine is bad and/or the corps hide side effects. Thalidomide comes to mind.

            Regulations requiring studies/data/tests for private companies to be published are non-existant or minimal still almost 50 years later.