MaoistLandlord [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 2 years agoHmmmimagemessage-square44 fedilinkarrow-up1117file-text
arrow-up1117imageHmmmMaoistLandlord [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 2 years agomessage-square44 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarezifnab25 [he/him, any]hexbear1·2 years agoIdk, man. That sounds like how you end up with guys like Nicolae Ceaușescu and Khrushchev running the show. Also, didn't Stalin and Tito have a falling out precisely because Tito wanted neutrality during the Cold War? link
minus-squareRamrodBaguette [comrade/them, he/him]hexbear1·edit-22 years ago1950s were much preferable in terms of revolutionary prospects than today, I'll say that much. And Tito broke with Stalin for a variety of factors. The tear began when Stalin refused to back the Greek communists in their civil war. link
Idk, man. That sounds like how you end up with guys like Nicolae Ceaușescu and Khrushchev running the show.
Also, didn't Stalin and Tito have a falling out precisely because Tito wanted neutrality during the Cold War?
1950s were much preferable in terms of revolutionary prospects than today, I'll say that much.
And Tito broke with Stalin for a variety of factors. The tear began when Stalin refused to back the Greek communists in their civil war.