Permanently Deleted

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This one from yogthuos is also a banger

      saving space

      Sigh, alright I guess I'll address the "concentration camps" nonsense in detail for you. The whole conspiracy theory started with a claim of millions of Uyghurs being supposedly imprisoned story is based on two highly dubious “studies.”.

      However, this claim is completely absurd when you stop and think about it even for a minute. That figure 1 million is repeated again and again. Let's just look at how much space would you actually need to intern one million people.

      This is a photo of Rikers Island, New York City's biggest prison. The actual size of a facility interning ten thousand people.

      Show

      According to Wikipedia, "The average daily inmate population on the island is about 10,000, although it can hold a maximum of 15,000." Let's assume this is a Xinjiang detention camp, holding ten to fifteen thousand people. How many of these would it take to hold one million people?

      Let's do some math:

      Rikers Size Rikers Prisoners One Million Uyghurs Size
      413.2 acres (0.645 square miles) 10,000 to 15,000 43 to 64 square miles

      In reality, one million people would probably take more space; all the supposed detention camps we see are much less dense than Rikers.

      For comparison, San Francisco is 47 square miles. Amsterdam is 64 square miles. You'd literally need detention camps that total the size of San Francisco or Amsterdam to intern one million Uyghurs. It'd be like looking at a map of California. There's Los Angeles. There's San Diego. And look, there's San Francisco Concentration City with its one million Uyghurs.

      Literally visible to the naked eye from space.

      Show

      CHRD states that it interviewed dozens of ethnic Uyghurs in the course of its study, but their enormous estimate was ultimately based on interviews with exactly eight Uyghur individuals. Based on this absurdly small sample of research subjects in an area whose total population is 20 million, CHRD “extrapolated estimates” that “at least 10% of villagers […] are being detained in re-education detention camps, and 20% are being forced to attend day/evening re-education camps in the villages or townships, totaling 30% in both types of camps.” Furthermore, it doesn't even make sense from logistics perspective.

      Practically all the stories we see about China trace back to Adrian Zenz is a far right fundamentalist nutcase and not a reliable source for any sort of information. The fact that he's the primary source for practically every article in western media demonstrates precisely what I'm talking about when I say that coverage is divorced from reality.

      Zenz is a born-again Christian who lectures at the European School of Culture and Theology. This anodyne-sounding campus is actually the German base of Columbia International University, a US-based evangelical Christian seminary which considers the “Bible to be the ultimate foundation and the final truth in every aspect of our lives,” and whose mission is to “educate people from a biblical worldview to impact the nations with the message of Christ.”

      Zenz’s work on China is inspired by this biblical worldview, as he recently explained in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. “I feel very clearly led by God to do this,” he said. “I can put it that way. I’m not afraid to say that. With Xinjiang, things really changed. It became like a mission, or a ministry.”.

      Along with his “mission” against China, heavenly guidance has apparently prompted Zenz to denounce homosexuality, gender equality, and the banning of physical punishment against children as threats to Christianity.

      Zenz outlined these views in a book he co-authored in 2012, titled Worthy to Escape: Why All Believers Will Not Be Raptured Before the Tribulation. In the tome, Zenz discussed the return of Jesus Christ, the coming wrath of God, and the rise of the Antichrist.

      The fact that this nutcase is being paraded as a credible researcher on the subject is absolutely surreal, and it's clear that the methodology of his "research" doesn't pass any kind of muster when examined closely.

      It's also worth noting that there is a political angle around the narrative around Xinjiang. For example, here's George Bush's chief of staff openly saying that US wants to destabilize the region, and NED recently admitting to funding Uyghur separatism for the past 16 years on their own official Twitter page. An ex-CIA operative details US operations radicalizing and training terrorists in the region in this book. Here's an excerpt:

      Show

      Show

      Show

      Show

      US has been stoking terrorism in the region while they've been running a propaganda campaign against China in the west. In fact, US even classified Uyghur separatists as a terrorist group at one point https://www.mintpressnews.com/us-was-at-war-uyghur-terrorists-now-claims-etim-doesnt-exist/276916/

      Here's an interview with a son of imam killed in Xinjiang https://news.cgtn.com/news/2020-06-19/Son-of-imam-assassinated-in-Kashgar-s-2014-mosque-attack-speaks-out-RqNiyrcRuo/index.html

      Here's an account from a Pakistani journalist who has been all over Xinjiang (which borders Pakistan) claims that western media reports on "atrocities" are lies. https://dailytimes.com.pk/723317/exposing-the-occidents-baseless-lies-about-xinjiang/

      It's also worth noting that the accusations originate entirely from the west while Muslim majority countries support China, and their leaders have visited Xinjiang many times.

      • https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/on-eid-xinjiang-imams-defend-china-against-u-s-criticism-1.5425967
      • https://www.bolnews.com/latest/2023/07/pak-religious-leaders-nurture-bonds-of-cooperation-with-xinjiang/
      • https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/w/islamic-envoys-say-china-is-protecting-minorities-in-xinjiang-after-five-day-visit

      Also notable that whenever western media actually deigns to visit Xinjiang, which is not often, they're unable to produce support for any of their claims of mass imprisonment and oppression, so they opt for insinuations instead https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-lifestyle-china-health-travel-7a6967f335f97ca868cc618ea84b98b9

      There's a further list of debunking here if you're interested https://redsails.org/the-xinjiang-atrocity-propaganda-blitz/

      The whole thing is very clearly a propaganda blitz that US is cynically using to manipulate impressionable people in the west.

    • iie [they/them, he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      here was Zenz' bad math — it's so egregious it had to be deliberate:

      • His claim was that 80% of net IUDs in China were applied in Xinjiang.
      • "Net IUDs" means "IUDs put in minus IUDs taken out"
      • That number can be zero or negative, and it approaches zero at equilibrium
      • Dividing Xinjiang's net number by China's net number does not give you a valid percent. The number is meaningless, it could be negative or even a division by zero.
      • Putting a percent symbol next to that quantity was almost certainly deliberate fraud. I can't see how you would sit down to do these calculations and not realize the problem

      It makes sense that Xinjiang's net number of IUD placements was higher than China's average, because the net rate per capita is going to be much higher in a developing region than in developed region where people have had IUD access for decades and the net rate is approaching equilibrium. Zenz twisted the numbers to make it seem like an astronomical number of IUDs were being applied in Xinjiang.

      • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
        ·
        7 months ago

        I specifically remember walking a liberal through the math on Reddit once and he literally could not fathom it. It short-circuited his brain, the idea that the BBC would repeat impossible math to shit-talk China simply could not be true, he was getting desperate. He was so confident that the math was correct that he was talking to me like I was a dogbrained 4 year old that couldn't understand basic addition or something lmao. I'm like rubbing his face into the chalkboard going "If Henan has 69% of new IUD insertions using this same formula, how could Xinjiang have 80% as well? Two regions alone account for over 100% of new IUD insertions?" and he's screeching IT'S REAL IT'S REAL

    • LaughingLion [any, any]
      ·
      7 months ago

      one correction.... the religious extremism didnt sneak in just from the taliban and such but rather the us government spent 100s of millions in actively going in there to train them to be terrorists and such

      id have to dig super hard but there is a wikipedia page about the money spent to radicalize muslims in china its been so long since i referenced it