It's very large, publicly traded (so, regular reputable audits), and based in NY which has the strictest crypto laws. Their business model makes sense, and they don't offer leverage (IIRC). In my eyes it is about as trustworthy as a normal company. I wouldn't recommend anybody keep their money in a CEX, but USDC seems like the most trustworthy stable to me.
If you put your son's college fund into the best high-yield FDIC insured bank account making 3% (current Marcus rate) you're fucking him over. At least put it in an index fund. If number stops going up he won't have to worry about paying for college because American capitalism will finally have been destroyed.
lmao 5% would be positively restrained. these frauds never promise less than 20% guaranteed. they're determined to make Bernie Madoff look conservative.
Actually, BlockFi, Celsius, etc. promised like 9-13%. Higher returns are available but are more up-front about the risk, these products pitched themselves as being safe as checking accounts which is obviously not true. I like this site but it frustrates me when it intersects with stuff I know a lot about.
No. Cash should be a tiny fraction of your portfolio, because (1) opportunity cost of not getting any return at all (2) it's actively melting away from inflation. High-yield savings accounts are nice but don't beat inflation.
USDC is worth evaluating because many risky investments are denominated in USDC.
Liquidity has its own value, particularly when prices are falling. And the projections for the next year's worth of stock performance is pretty grim. Idk if I'd be rushing out to buy in right now, given the uncertainty and the rising Fed interest rates. Also... rising rates mean savings accounts actually aren't the worst place to stash your money atm.
USDC is worth evaluating
Consider investing in ASAB: All stablecoins are bad.
It sucks to have to sell investments during a downturn, but they're still liquid. It's not sound advice to keep more cash than is necessary for operational reasons. At least buy some bonds or something if you're bearish.
High-yield savings accounts are nice but don’t beat inflation.
rising rates mean savings accounts actually aren’t the worst place to stash your money atm.
They're better than like, a checking account or a mattress. Marcus is 3% rn, which seems great until you remember that inflation is way higher than that.
Part of the problem with a down market is that there aren't a lot of great places to stash cash. So, yes, you're going to have a high risk of some kind of loss everywhere.
Inflation sucks, but a cash loss of 4-5% a year is still better than losing 10% on some equity or index fund.
Unless you are a very good trader (I'm not) you're gonna miss the timing on when to put money back in, and probably come out worse overall. My mindset is conventional /r/personalfinance one: if you don't need it, don't touch it, leave it in VOO or whatever til nearing retirement.
Its not a matter of timing so much as value. Right now P/E on most stocks is still kinda high. Although, I guess under 20 isn't crazy.
I just wouldn't be in a rush to turn free cash into equities under these conditions. If you're already in, I agree its not a great time to pull out either. But telling someone with a bunch of free cash to buy up equities in this market seems like bad advice.
If you're doing more than maxing out Roth/401k, you're taking a gamble.
Yeah idk. Watching Tesla/GME/etc fluctuate based on vibes has kind of destroyed what little faith I had in value-based investing. If someone has a lump sum of cash I'd say DCA in to the highest yield thing that fits your risk tolerance. My own is pretty high*, I'm decades from retirement, but I think for most people that's probably something riskier than a savings account.
*hence doing stablecoin stuff. High platform risks in exchange for no price risk; I happen to be good at evaluating platform risk and hopeless at speculating.
Watching Tesla/GME/etc fluctuate based on vibes has kind of destroyed what little faith I had in value-based investing.
Tesla was a growth stock predicted on the theory that it could rapidly gobble up the domestic car market. Also, heavily predicated on revenue from government subsidies.
GME was pure memes. A total sucker's bet. It just demonstrated what an internet full of dorks could do to the price of an equity with low trade volume.
These were both exceptions that outperformed during a historic bull market. And they're both crashing back down to earth.
If someone has a lump sum of cash I’d say DCA in to the highest yield thing that fits your risk tolerance.
Right. And, ideally, in something big and safe like Berkshire or J&J or just the S&P index if you're feeling lazy.
I happen to be good at evaluating platform risk
I guess time will tell on that one. My friend lost a boatload on Terra/Luna with that attitude.
GME is still 5x from before the nonsense. I know if the market was "rational" we'd be able to predict it and the rationality would get arbed out, but it skeeves me out that prices can fluctuate so wildly based on vibes. I am an index fund guy, the government doesn't care that much about individual big companies but it's not gonna let the overall line go down long term.
I'm pretty confident about USDC, I think the only way I'll get popped is if Eth/BTC/etc actually goes to 0 and kills Coinbase (can't get rid of all price risk). I passed on UST a few months ago when I was looking at something called Stablegains. At that time the ecosystem was pretty obviously rotten: basically every project's yield ultimately flowed from Anchor, which was just shoveling out investor cash at an insane unsustainable rate. The market knew it too, every pool with UST in it offered much higher yield than the reputable stables because of the risk.
I'd prefer USD as collateral, because what I'm actually interested in is decentralized stuff where reading the code is enough to tell you 80% of whether it's good. Algo stablecoins are risky in a market like this, even if they're backed by Eth instead of Luna (lol), and I think the other centralized coins are made by sketchier companies than Coinbase. Unfortunately there is little financial incentive to accept deposits, issue stablecoins, and just sit on the deposits instead of investing them. Coinbase says they do this now, pretty sure they subsidize this arm of their business in order to be the default reputable exchange for US users.
Its trading $10 (40%) off its 2014 high of $14/share. The $1-2 valuation during its brush with bankruptcy was (not unjustifiably) seen as artificially low. A company with $1B in revenue enjoying an $8B market cap isn't unheard of, even if it is hemorrhaging $100M/year. And - baring another internet hysteria sponsored surge - it'll likely bleed out over the next five years like a normal failing company would.
But again, its an exception, not a rule.
I’m pretty confident about USDC, I think the only way I’ll get popped is if Eth/BTC/etc actually goes to 0 and kills Coinbase (can’t get rid of all price risk).
They don't need to go to zero. They just need to slip below the point at which you can reliably liquidate. That will set off a panic that kills the stablecoin. These vehicles don't function when everyone tries to exit them at once precisely because the brokerages are futzing with their cash reserves on risky investments so often. Maybe Coinbase really is a This One Is Different case. But... :doubt:
what I’m actually interested in is decentralized stuff where reading the code is enough to tell you 80% of whether it’s good
They just need to slip below the point at which you can reliably liquidate.
TL;DR I give Coinbase the "this one is different". Think that the NY attorney general and SEC will continue keeping them in line. The only thing that differentiates them from other CEXes is that they're not sketchy; to keep that they've done stuff like shutting down margin trading when the CFTC said rather than just moving jurisdictions. Based on this I think that (1) they're not commingling with Circle (2) their statements are accurate, e.g..
sigh Well, good luck with that.
I write Solidity for a living, would not be so confident if I hadn't been able to compare my work to that of auditors.
Do you have any reasons why USDC is a scam compared to other stables? If it's just "crypto/stables are scams" you're not wrong but it's tough to make money off that without taking on crypto price risk, which I don't do.
mate, every stable coin is sold on the basis of a promise - either that it's backed by "reserves", a term the crypto community actively lies about, conflating deposits with reserves, or that it's peg is algorithmically maintained. you're giving money to capitalists on their word that they're trustworthy enough to deserve sole and exclusive access to the money printer. it's only in finance that people can promise literally no value yet invent capital out of thin air. stable coins are a scam. the only ones who profit are the people at the top of the pyramid.
I'd expect the defi guys to take the opportunity to gloat, but what's the argument that Coinbase is safer than any other centralized crypto bookie?
No clue. Crypto bros don't seem like the type to really think these things through as long as it justifies their use of crypto.
It's very large, publicly traded (so, regular reputable audits), and based in NY which has the strictest crypto laws. Their business model makes sense, and they don't offer leverage (IIRC). In my eyes it is about as trustworthy as a normal company. I wouldn't recommend anybody keep their money in a CEX, but USDC seems like the most trustworthy stable to me.
Keep your money in an FDIC insured bank account
deleted by creator
If you put your son's college fund into the best high-yield FDIC insured bank account making 3% (current Marcus rate) you're fucking him over. At least put it in an index fund. If number stops going up he won't have to worry about paying for college because American capitalism will finally have been destroyed.
lmao 5% would be positively restrained. these frauds never promise less than 20% guaranteed. they're determined to make Bernie Madoff look conservative.
Actually, BlockFi, Celsius, etc. promised like 9-13%. Higher returns are available but are more up-front about the risk, these products pitched themselves as being safe as checking accounts which is obviously not true. I like this site but it frustrates me when it intersects with stuff I know a lot about.
aww shit, the obvious scams only promised ponzi scheme level returns. they're so reasonable.
Not defending them, just pointing out you don't seem to know basic facts about this sector.
nah, I got a good feeling about this horse, baby! she's gonna win us back the farm!
No. Cash should be a tiny fraction of your portfolio, because (1) opportunity cost of not getting any return at all (2) it's actively melting away from inflation. High-yield savings accounts are nice but don't beat inflation.
USDC is worth evaluating because many risky investments are denominated in USDC.
Liquidity has its own value, particularly when prices are falling. And the projections for the next year's worth of stock performance is pretty grim. Idk if I'd be rushing out to buy in right now, given the uncertainty and the rising Fed interest rates. Also... rising rates mean savings accounts actually aren't the worst place to stash your money atm.
Consider investing in ASAB: All stablecoins are bad.
It sucks to have to sell investments during a downturn, but they're still liquid. It's not sound advice to keep more cash than is necessary for operational reasons. At least buy some bonds or something if you're bearish.
They're better than like, a checking account or a mattress. Marcus is 3% rn, which seems great until you remember that inflation is way higher than that.
Part of the problem with a down market is that there aren't a lot of great places to stash cash. So, yes, you're going to have a high risk of some kind of loss everywhere.
Inflation sucks, but a cash loss of 4-5% a year is still better than losing 10% on some equity or index fund.
Unless you are a very good trader (I'm not) you're gonna miss the timing on when to put money back in, and probably come out worse overall. My mindset is conventional /r/personalfinance one: if you don't need it, don't touch it, leave it in VOO or whatever til nearing retirement.
Its not a matter of timing so much as value. Right now P/E on most stocks is still kinda high. Although, I guess under 20 isn't crazy.
I just wouldn't be in a rush to turn free cash into equities under these conditions. If you're already in, I agree its not a great time to pull out either. But telling someone with a bunch of free cash to buy up equities in this market seems like bad advice.
If you're doing more than maxing out Roth/401k, you're taking a gamble.
Yeah idk. Watching Tesla/GME/etc fluctuate based on vibes has kind of destroyed what little faith I had in value-based investing. If someone has a lump sum of cash I'd say DCA in to the highest yield thing that fits your risk tolerance. My own is pretty high*, I'm decades from retirement, but I think for most people that's probably something riskier than a savings account.
*hence doing stablecoin stuff. High platform risks in exchange for no price risk; I happen to be good at evaluating platform risk and hopeless at speculating.
Tesla was a growth stock predicted on the theory that it could rapidly gobble up the domestic car market. Also, heavily predicated on revenue from government subsidies.
GME was pure memes. A total sucker's bet. It just demonstrated what an internet full of dorks could do to the price of an equity with low trade volume.
These were both exceptions that outperformed during a historic bull market. And they're both crashing back down to earth.
Right. And, ideally, in something big and safe like Berkshire or J&J or just the S&P index if you're feeling lazy.
I guess time will tell on that one. My friend lost a boatload on Terra/Luna with that attitude.
GME is still 5x from before the nonsense. I know if the market was "rational" we'd be able to predict it and the rationality would get arbed out, but it skeeves me out that prices can fluctuate so wildly based on vibes. I am an index fund guy, the government doesn't care that much about individual big companies but it's not gonna let the overall line go down long term.
I'm pretty confident about USDC, I think the only way I'll get popped is if Eth/BTC/etc actually goes to 0 and kills Coinbase (can't get rid of all price risk). I passed on UST a few months ago when I was looking at something called Stablegains. At that time the ecosystem was pretty obviously rotten: basically every project's yield ultimately flowed from Anchor, which was just shoveling out investor cash at an insane unsustainable rate. The market knew it too, every pool with UST in it offered much higher yield than the reputable stables because of the risk.
I'd prefer USD as collateral, because what I'm actually interested in is decentralized stuff where reading the code is enough to tell you 80% of whether it's good. Algo stablecoins are risky in a market like this, even if they're backed by Eth instead of Luna (lol), and I think the other centralized coins are made by sketchier companies than Coinbase. Unfortunately there is little financial incentive to accept deposits, issue stablecoins, and just sit on the deposits instead of investing them. Coinbase says they do this now, pretty sure they subsidize this arm of their business in order to be the default reputable exchange for US users.
Its trading $10 (40%) off its 2014 high of $14/share. The $1-2 valuation during its brush with bankruptcy was (not unjustifiably) seen as artificially low. A company with $1B in revenue enjoying an $8B market cap isn't unheard of, even if it is hemorrhaging $100M/year. And - baring another internet hysteria sponsored surge - it'll likely bleed out over the next five years like a normal failing company would.
But again, its an exception, not a rule.
They don't need to go to zero. They just need to slip below the point at which you can reliably liquidate. That will set off a panic that kills the stablecoin. These vehicles don't function when everyone tries to exit them at once precisely because the brokerages are futzing with their cash reserves on risky investments so often. Maybe Coinbase really is a This One Is Different case. But... :doubt:
sigh Well, good luck with that.
TL;DR I give Coinbase the "this one is different". Think that the NY attorney general and SEC will continue keeping them in line. The only thing that differentiates them from other CEXes is that they're not sketchy; to keep that they've done stuff like shutting down margin trading when the CFTC said rather than just moving jurisdictions. Based on this I think that (1) they're not commingling with Circle (2) their statements are accurate, e.g..
I write Solidity for a living, would not be so confident if I hadn't been able to compare my work to that of auditors.
USDC is a scam.
All stable-coins are scams. Pretty much baked into the premise of the product.
Not compared to Tether.
there can be two scams at the same time.
Do you have any reasons why USDC is a scam compared to other stables? If it's just "crypto/stables are scams" you're not wrong but it's tough to make money off that without taking on crypto price risk, which I don't do.
mate, every stable coin is sold on the basis of a promise - either that it's backed by "reserves", a term the crypto community actively lies about, conflating deposits with reserves, or that it's peg is algorithmically maintained. you're giving money to capitalists on their word that they're trustworthy enough to deserve sole and exclusive access to the money printer. it's only in finance that people can promise literally no value yet invent capital out of thin air. stable coins are a scam. the only ones who profit are the people at the top of the pyramid.
Have a nice day