This post is a great example of a place where AI cannot match humans, and won't be able to for a very long time or maybe ever. Computers completely shit the bed on interpreting ambiguous text from context clues (more on that here. If the problem were submitted in proper formula format to something like Wolfram alpha it would solve it no problem, but asking it conversationally gives results like this.
That take is always extra frustrating because human brains are not computers. In fact we still have absolutely no idea what human consciousness fundamentally is.
That doesn’t stop some folks, including on Hexbear, pulling the reductionist take of “and so are we, especially you if you disagree.” Something something meat computers something something meatspace get schwifty
There was one meatspace bro on here who said that because of "meditation" that they agreed that we were basically giant meatballs or something like that. Honestly sounded like it came straight out of the Sam Harris subr*ddit...
Someone pointed out that this stuff is probably better viewed as a replacement for search engines than for people. It mostly outputs garbage, but also sifts through the garbage results google finds to give you the content of whichever stackoverflow page is relevant probably quicker than you can. And once that's aggregated a competent human can make sense of it.
so we add a bunch of natural language processing to search on the query side and now it's harder to look up specific things so the boys down in engineering cooked up this to pluck out the results i could've gotten 15 years ago with some knowloedge of booleans and regular expressions?
This lets you customize results better. For example let's say you ask it to provide a snippet of code to do X. You can then provide it instructions to tweak it slightly
Earlier you would search online and find code to do X but you would need to know how to tweak it
Eh, it's a bit better than a parrot. It gives you, what is essentially, the most statistically likely prediction (give or take) of what all the data it's fed suggests the answer should be. It's more like a really, really good probability machine capable of working with an insane amount of data. The most interesting thing about the chatgpt, I've found, is the size of its "short term memory" and the ability to prime it for the responses you're looking for. Last night I asked it if it was familiar with visual novels, and after it spit out some basic summary, I had it write a 3 act visual novel outline for the story of John Brown's raid on Harper Ferry. Then I asked if it was familiar with JSON structures and how they 're used by visual novel engines, and got it spit out the story outline, with a bit of extra interactions, as a JSON; Just not one that works with the engine I'm trying to use. I'm curious to see if I can teach it the json structure of a specific visual novel engine.
You can call it a parrot all you want, but you're missing out on the opportunity that this could be a big ol' Leftist agitprop slop machine.
Once again reminding everyone that ChatGPT is essentially a fancy, electronic parrot
Reminding everyone that when someone says AI, they usually mean a fancy, electronic parrot.
deleted by creator
This post is a great example of a place where AI cannot match humans, and won't be able to for a very long time or maybe ever. Computers completely shit the bed on interpreting ambiguous text from context clues (more on that here. If the problem were submitted in proper formula format to something like Wolfram alpha it would solve it no problem, but asking it conversationally gives results like this.
deleted by creator
For sure. The turing test and its consequences :thonk-cri:
deleted by creator
I always assumed you were the DM.
deleted by creator
:wtf-am-i-reading:
That take is always extra frustrating because human brains are not computers. In fact we still have absolutely no idea what human consciousness fundamentally is.
There was one meatspace bro on here who said that because of "meditation" that they agreed that we were basically giant meatballs or something like that. Honestly sounded like it came straight out of the Sam Harris subr*ddit...
Someone pointed out that this stuff is probably better viewed as a replacement for search engines than for people. It mostly outputs garbage, but also sifts through the garbage results google finds to give you the content of whichever stackoverflow page is relevant probably quicker than you can. And once that's aggregated a competent human can make sense of it.
so we add a bunch of natural language processing to search on the query side and now it's harder to look up specific things so the boys down in engineering cooked up this to pluck out the results i could've gotten 15 years ago with some knowloedge of booleans and regular expressions?
progress is so cool
It's like the most boring version of a robot war.
This lets you customize results better. For example let's say you ask it to provide a snippet of code to do X. You can then provide it instructions to tweak it slightly
Earlier you would search online and find code to do X but you would need to know how to tweak it
i would simply get both the snippet and the tweak from stackoverflow
Eh, it's a bit better than a parrot. It gives you, what is essentially, the most statistically likely prediction (give or take) of what all the data it's fed suggests the answer should be. It's more like a really, really good probability machine capable of working with an insane amount of data. The most interesting thing about the chatgpt, I've found, is the size of its "short term memory" and the ability to prime it for the responses you're looking for. Last night I asked it if it was familiar with visual novels, and after it spit out some basic summary, I had it write a 3 act visual novel outline for the story of John Brown's raid on Harper Ferry. Then I asked if it was familiar with JSON structures and how they 're used by visual novel engines, and got it spit out the story outline, with a bit of extra interactions, as a JSON; Just not one that works with the engine I'm trying to use. I'm curious to see if I can teach it the json structure of a specific visual novel engine.
You can call it a parrot all you want, but you're missing out on the opportunity that this could be a big ol' Leftist agitprop slop machine.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
:melon-musk:
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator