There is an ongoing debate within Democratic Socialists of America on the question of Ukraine. Many individual DSA members and chapters have upheld the
Hm, there's a distinction between the statements of the NPC and the IC in that the NPC does the "condemn both sides but let's talk more about america" whereas the IC properly chronicalizes the events leading up to the invasion including the failures of the Ukraine to follow both Minsk agreements.
The key thing here is that because the DSA-NPC and DSA-IC are a national formation they've been better able to put aside their disagreements to work together on advancing the anti-war and anti-imperialism camp explicitly against their home country's role in the war, whereas the international communist movement is still choking on the question of whether or not it's bad to invade fascist nations.
Also I've been :logout: and logging in for the past 2 hours just to make this reply lmfao
Just cause the IC one is from before the invasion and the NPC one is a more public facing short statement after the invasion. The current NPC basically defers to IC on handling foreign policy stuff in general and not really overrides things cause theyve approved everything. I think there's largely political unity at the national level on this among the major internal political factions. The only people complaining have been the ones like la botz who wrote this article, but they are inconsequential cranks and in a small minority now.
also idk whats wrong w the site right now it keeps logging me out too lol
Hm, there's a distinction between the statements of the NPC and the IC in that the NPC does the "condemn both sides but let's talk more about america" whereas the IC properly chronicalizes the events leading up to the invasion including the failures of the Ukraine to follow both Minsk agreements.
The key thing here is that because the DSA-NPC and DSA-IC are a national formation they've been better able to put aside their disagreements to work together on advancing the anti-war and anti-imperialism camp explicitly against their home country's role in the war, whereas the international communist movement is still choking on the question of whether or not it's bad to invade fascist nations.
Also I've been :logout: and logging in for the past 2 hours just to make this reply lmfao
The heart of a poster
:fidel-salute:
Just cause the IC one is from before the invasion and the NPC one is a more public facing short statement after the invasion. The current NPC basically defers to IC on handling foreign policy stuff in general and not really overrides things cause theyve approved everything. I think there's largely political unity at the national level on this among the major internal political factions. The only people complaining have been the ones like la botz who wrote this article, but they are inconsequential cranks and in a small minority now.
also idk whats wrong w the site right now it keeps logging me out too lol
At least they got rules based order libs in charge lol
The war to keep posting even when the site tells you to :logout: continues