A group of U.S. researchers has modelled where society’s current path — an unmitigated spread of COVID — would lead. They concluded that unfettered transmission could result in death tolls exceeding 100,000 a year in the U.S. alone. “Endemicity is not a victory,” they added.

:doomer:

  • AHopeOnceMore [he/him]B
    ·
    2 years ago

    The person that came up with the name "Kracken" for this variant (in the hopes of getting people out of the "everything is omicron" minimizing nonsense) is a very online yet fairly reasonable Twitter scientist that would dunk on a lot of folks in the recent COVID minimization threads here.

    • FoolishFool [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      the recent COVID minimization threads here

      There was one post several days ago now, and it wasn't even about minimizing covid.

        • FoolishFool [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          The site is overwhelmingly covid-conscious. Equating a "touch grass" post with "The site is majority let it rip" or something is silly.

          • booty [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            “The site is majority let it rip”

            Literally no one said this, who are you talking to?

          • AHopeOnceMore [he/him]B
            ·
            2 years ago

            Now you're just being silly, talking about things I haven't said.

            And the post I'm thinking about cast undeserved doubts on immune damage from COVID.

            • FoolishFool [she/her]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              We could very well be thinking of 2 different posts.

              I'm just tired of people complaining about the one I'm thinking of and making it a bigger deal than it was.

              Edit: For context, I meant this post

              • AHopeOnceMore [he/him]B
                ·
                2 years ago

                Oh yeah that post is more or less fine. IMO people are sometimes getting stuck in a dichotomous way of thinking: either be a 100% hermit or hey just hang out like whatever with no mask. In the latter case they might give up on masks and visit people, become a regular at indoor bars, etc etc.

                There's a reasonable middle ground of still seeing people but being careful with masking and limiting exposure and so on. I don't think folks consider it enough in these convos.

      • macabrett
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

    • Bloobish [comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly wish more people in government would have some online literacy course (besides the fash) on how important delivery is to social media and mass media