We've seen an uptick in people posting dunks in here that belong in dunk_tank, as well as low-hanging fruit that gets removed from or isn't allowed in dunk_tank anymore. For context, rule 8 of dunk_tank:

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this.

There's a reason that dunks are cordoned off to their own comm, some users rightfully don't want to see reactionary nonsense all the time, even if we're making fun of the person who said it. /c/cth is a general-purpose comm but it's NOT for posting some random nobody asshole twitter user's bad takes, the absolute best course of action to take when you see that stuff out in the wild is to either directly shit on them yourself, or ignore them and don't give them more attention.

From this point on I'm going to be more stringent about moderating this. I get it, it's fun to dunk on the libs and the blue checks and the frothingfash and that's why we have a whole dedicated comm for that. Any post that's obviously meant to be "hey look at this piece of shit, let's laugh at how bad their opinions are, upbears to the left and emojis in chat" belongs in the_dunk_tank. And any super low-hanging fruit doesn't belong on this site, period (see TDT rule 8 above). We have better things to do with our time than give unearned attention, time and energy to low-follower-count nobodies yelling into the void.

Thanks for your discretion comrades, stay sicko sicko-jammin

edit: as others have pointed out, /c/shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml is a good place for any and all dunking content not allowed here. Post that ragebait to our comrades at the 'grad, they'll make good use of it. Also, per rule 9 of TFT dunking on fediverse users is still explicitly allowed so it's still open season on those in our own backyard.

  • buckykat [none/use name]
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is an entirely predictable result of the addition of the bad rule 8 to the_dunk_tank

    • booty [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The purpose of this comm is literally to quarantine all of the "finding an idiot to get mad at" posts. This rule change is gonna make the rest of the site worse.

      -ElGosso, 30 days ago on the dunk tank rule change post. Hm. Must be a psychic. Only explanation.

    • Infamousblt [any]
      ·
      8 months ago

      I called it too and asked for a quarantine zone for those kinda posts but was denied. LET US HAVE OUR SLOP

      • buckykat [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        This conviction the mods seem to have that "[dunking on] super low-hanging fruit doesn't belong on this site, period" is weird and bad

        • BountifulEggnog [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Also "low hanging fruit" are posts not a lot of people have seen, while I guess the "high effort dunks" are posting whatever garbage Elon and jk have been up to because they have more views. Seems backwards to me :shrug-outta-hecks:

          • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]M
            ·
            8 months ago

            "I saw this and now you have to see this too" is not a good reason for posting. People don't need to see every bad take on the internet.

            • Greenleaf [he/him]
              ·
              8 months ago

              And the cousin of that one: “I got into an argument with a lib on Reddit so here’s our chain of single upvote comments, please tell I won the argument”

              • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]M
                ·
                8 months ago

                Exactly! That's the type of thing that should be clear is banned.

                There's gonna be a middle ground between there and "moderately famous poster" that's gonna take some figuring out, but even just trimming that and things like 15-like YouTube comments from someone with a couple of subscribers, random anonymous racists arguing in the comments of a local newspaper article, things like that.

            • BountifulEggnog [she/her]
              ·
              8 months ago

              "I saw this, thought it was a funny bad take, and am now sharing with other people who will laugh at this fool" is usually my thought. I imagine the same is true for other dunk tank posters?

              now you have to see this too

              No one actually has to view the dunk tank. They can block it, scroll by, whatever. I scroll past a lot of posts. Hextube gets pinned all the time, but is of no relevance to me. Other comms I've blocked all together 🤷

          • buckykat [none/use name]
            ·
            8 months ago

            Right. Seems kinda backwards if the criteria is "low hanging"

            i-think-that the numbers below a post do not actually affect its dunkability.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, but it should cool off after a while. I'm sure that now both comms are going after the low hanging fruit posts the posts will just wean off.

      • FourteenEyes [he/him]
        ·
        8 months ago

        What is wrong with low hanging fruit anyway

        It's not like making fun of reactionary losers is important work or anything

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]
          ·
          8 months ago

          shrug-outta-hecks They belong better in some of the Lemmygrad lib showcase comms. I've seen too many posts on here and /r/trueanon that are just random nobodies saying deranged things 4 years ago. I don't mind it too much and it's ultimately not dissimilar from the approved posts, but it's extremely reddit energy to be dunking on low hanging fruit from trolls.

          • FourteenEyes [he/him]
            ·
            8 months ago

            So ignore them and let them settle to the bottom of the pile with all the other poor engagement posts

            • EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]M
              ·
              8 months ago

              So, what you're saying is to defeat bad posts in the marketplace of ideas, rather than to use political power to do so?

              • booty [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Why do we have to "defeat" bad posts at all? Hexbear is a site where a significant portion of the posts are bad on purpose. We have an entire comm dedicated to posting the worst posts we can come up with. Title: I farded, body: hehe is a completely valid Hexbear post. In fact, it's probably been posted multiple times already.

                We should be "defeating" posts that are racist, ableist, transphobic, liberal, etc. We shouldn't be "defeating" posts that are bad, that's what this site is for

                  • GarbageShoot [he/him]
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Your application of your political ideology to how you think the site should be run is incoherent enough that being facetious in that fashion doesn't work.

                  • booty [he/him]
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Maybe if you could articulate an actual reason that you've chosen one particular genre of hexbear post to bully people with your mod powers over, I would be more open to laughing at your jokes. As it stands, your communications here just sound lifeless and corporate and make it difficult to entertain any humor involved.

                  • booty [he/him]
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    then block the comm and leave us alone? "i don't like this kind of post so mods need to remove it and ban people for posting it" is baby shit

      • BountifulEggnog [she/her]
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Is the fruit somehow higher if the person has more followers? I honestly don't understand.

        A post is higher effort the more eyeballs the original had?

        • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, part of the problem with these rules is that there's no good way to draw a line between what's low-hanging fruit and what's a legitimate target for hexbear dunking. The rule relies on the mood of the mod present at the time of posting.

      • buckykat [none/use name]
        ·
        8 months ago

        Surely everyone will stop posting the posts they like to post because the two comms those posts best fit in ban those posts

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah? We had people posting casual transphobia and casual racism here in the early days, heavy moderation put an end to that. Obviously bad posts and bigotry aren't comparable but you get the idea, moderation is like cyberbullying but with institutional power; and if we've learned anything from the posting wars it's that bullying works.

          • buckykat [none/use name]
            ·
            8 months ago

            That's not really comparable. Racism and transphobia are actually bad and ideologically opposed to the ideals of the site, making fun of bad opinions but with numbers that are too small under them is not. Getting rid of people who post racism and transphobia is a good thing to do, but are you actually suggesting banning low-hanging-fruit-dunkers?

            • FunkyStuff [he/him]
              ·
              8 months ago

              As I said, it's not about the morals of the behavior, just the behavior itself and the fact that moderation will inevitably tone it down. And I don't think bans make sense for rule 8, but do you think people who post random twitter screenshots to the dunk tank are gonna keep going after their 36th consecutive post gets removed?