:heated-gamer-moment: :gamer-gulag: :heartbreaking:
Website that will tell you if anyone you follow on Twitch has played "That Wizard Game" <---- 'suspended by it's owner'
:heated-gamer-moment: :gamer-gulag: :heartbreaking:
Website that will tell you if anyone you follow on Twitch has played "That Wizard Game" <---- 'suspended by it's owner'
I don't know, find it a bit hypocritical that people do this and are rightfully angry at JKR, then most likely go on to play overwatch and call of duty. The games made by Activision blizzard, you know, the company so full of sexual misconduct that the US military had to pull it's blood money sponsorships. And yeah, the US military was directly giving payment offers to call of duty streamers at one point, and sponsoring all the e sports festivals.
At the end of the day I don't really do any boycotts, because it just seems ineffective. The only one I keep up with is BDS, because it actually seems to be effective where I live. But I didn't boycott last year's FIFA world cup in Qatar, and I won't boycott the US edition either. And I probably will check out the latest game made by Activision at some point, if I get a new game console or PC.
The difference here is that an oppressed group is telling you, trans or ally, as a group, to boycott the game. Not because it'll reduce sales any real amount (though that would be nice), but for these reasons, the same reasons for many early pro-LGBT protests.
By opposing this franchise publically and aggressively, we tell people who use Harry Potter as a dog whistle that if they fuck around, trans allies exist, and will surely make them find out.
To normalise gay rights we had to start small. The right to use a bar without it being raided. The right to not seeing slurs and insults in a local newspaper. You might think getting a newspaper to use proper terms is a trivial battle, but more often than not it didn't just require boycotts and angry libs annoyed they can't enjoy things, but street battles and protests and people in jail. More importantly, those battles honed us, helped us organise for the bigger, nastier fights to come.
Carrying on from 2. It lets us know who and where allies are, and how strongly they will support. If someone makes nice sounds and then loudly buys the game because no one can tell them how to buy their treats, they aren't cadre material. If they are quiet, they aren't cadre material.
But those who support, well, they're capable of acting as a group, not an individual only concerned with individual moral sentiment. That's an ally, someone trans people can use, maybe even rely on. Taking stock of vocal supporters, and gauging the current strength of such support, has real value.
This isn't any grand plan, mind, but if you lead people through why, slowly, these are the real, political reasons for this action.
We know we can't fight every single battle. But we can choose a battle and fight it on our terms, on the terms Trans people choose collectively. The question is, will you join them when they ask?
(ok, how do I remove or at least regularise the damn indents?)
deleted by creator
Yeah but some won't and having them cut their teeth on something small is a good bit of practice. also makes the chuds rage which is fun.
Are we seriously at that point? I find that hard to believe, but I've also tuned out of all Harry Potter discussions since the Shaun video on it. I've just stopped caring about this culture war issue.
We are. Jessie Gender did a video on it, and another trans person makes a pretty affecting case for the damage done
I'm sure that they exist, but kinda sounds like you just made up a group of people to be indignant about. I'd imagine if someone is rightfully upset about supporting a bigot and are also online/tuned in enough then Activision games are also on the chopping block.
There's thousands of good games, I lived and breathed Blizzard for over a decade and I have no real inclination to add a few more skulls to Bobby's throne, their franchises are hot garbage at this point anyways.
Trust me there are several trans influencers boycotting Hogwarts legacy but play over watch
And they rightfully deserve to be called out for the hypocrisy, just seems a little disingenuous to paint everyone with that brush.
Isnt overwatch free tho??? Idk much about boycotting free games
in "free" products you are the product. playing free to play games at all supports the company.
No there are lots of terminally online people out there like this, 500k follower twitter account. Just on their latest moral crusade without a shred of self awareness.
And most of the comments are calling them out for it.
God the "well I want to support the devs" argument is so fucking bad. (And would apply to Hogwarts Legacy too if it werent a bad argument so???)
the difference i guess is that Harry Potter is an ass franchise with no strong foothold in the video game market. but i am a sailing enthusiast myself so ultimately it doesnt matter
This is true, and JKR is so out there repulsive as well.
I won't be playing the game anyways, but if I was a Harry Potter fan and saw her comments, I would probably boycott the game too even if it made me a hypocrite.
I guess we're all hypocrites in some way
hearing all the people gushing about the magic of the franchise and getting giddy over what house they will choose honestly gives me the heebie jeebies. like i grew up with it too, i have zero clue how theyre mustering all this enthusiasm for bad performances by child actors.
I updated the first reply now.
Also yeah I already had one awkward teenage phase in a English style boarding school, don't need another one.
maybe i was just destined to not give a fuck. i feel like pokemon starters have better characterization than what is in the harry potter movies :shrug-outta-hecks:
yeah, pretty much. gryffindor is the good guys who are cool and nice, slytherin is the bad guys who are evil and slimy and live in a dungeon. ravenclaw and hufflepuff are, like, there. sometimes. thats pretty much it
Which one are you: Good, smart, racist, other
The acting wasn't bad, don't just make crap up to get mad at.
on the whole the first two films are still pretty good if you entirely divorce them from JK Rowling but the child actors were very unambiguously bad (except for emma watson, she managed to make Hermione seem exactly the right level of self assured annoying teacher’s pet she is in the first few books)
Hard-core disagree, they did a decent job. They conveyed shock, surprise, fear, and all their emotions decently. Some lines were clunky but that's because they're talking about weird British magic stuff
It was though
The problems with Harry Potter are broadcast constantly and evident with even cursory glance at discussion of it, while activion blizzard hides it's problems. It's like how chick fil a is blatantly evil, even though McDonald's does more evil when you look into it.
I think a big difference is while we know blizzard does all that shit they aren't advocating it. JKR is constantly promoting hateful shit to the point that it's become part of the Harry Potter brand.