thats the post. dont lie to me i will know

  • Dolores [love/loves]
    hexagon
    ·
    2 years ago

    power of millions of dollars. i don't think any stage performances are dealing with the same level of wealth in the cast & investment in the project

    • Mardoniush [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      At the top end it's more than you might think. Phantom costs almost a million USD a week to put on Broadway, supposedly. The Vienna Opera house gets about 55 million Euro a year purely in government subsidy, before ticket sales. And it is uh, not turning a profit.

      • Dolores [love/loves]
        hexagon
        ·
        2 years ago

        :thonk: 2001's budget adjusted for inflation would be running that phantom show for 84 weeks. which i guess isn't all that long really

        15 euro for nosebleeds in an opera house & the government's running it at a loss? :ussr-cry: consequences of the fall

        • Mardoniush [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Almost every house in Europe runs a loss, it's been that way since the 1650s, subsidised by either the state or rich assholes, pays starvation wages even to the leads, somehow never makes the money back, rich assholes get tax write off...oh...look...all the production budget went to their set painting side business.

          Sydney runs in the black, at the cost of exactly 1 interesting opera a year, the rest horrible stagings of Traviata, and firing the chorus for 3 months to put on a musical (which they have to re-audition for)

          • Dolores [love/loves]
            hexagon
            ·
            2 years ago

            justifying my ignorance of opera because of the bourgeois practices and tradition of the houses:denguin: