• axont [she/her, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I'm probably never going to understand at all how the politically illiterate equate us and fascists. We don't point at anything secret going on, we outline how these exact circumstances lead to these outcomes. We're not talking about shadowy capitalists or secret plans of world domination, the world is already dominated by capitalists who have names in the Forbes 500.

    The fascist worldview makes no sense whatsoever and is built entirely on white supremacist racial panic. It requires belief in a high organized group of secret malefactors who use mind control magic to turn the world against white people because they're simply jealous of white people's supposed natural superiority. Everything's a secret war between white people and non-white people. The presumption is white people have a magical code of morals that not only makes a stable society, but somehow makes nature itself work in harmony. There's a very specific structure society is supposed to take, and when there's deviation, the world collapses and humanity goes extinct. The other side of this war might as well be demons. They hate planet Earth and want to subjugate white people because they simply don't like natural harmony. They want birthrates low, they want to enact "globalism" to dilute the power of white magic, and they only benefit from this, because they're chaos demons or something.

    • Findom_DeLuise [she/her, they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m probably never going to understand at all how the politically illiterate equate us and fascists

      The US education system and news media both inundate American citizens with gumbynism no iphone vuvuzela 100 bajillion dead because no heckin' smol bean business owners allowed to have egg monopolies or sugar plantations. It's the same Protestant work ethic prosperity gospel shit that replaced the Divine Right of Kings a couple of centuries ago, just weaponized against anyone who would rightfully call it out as bullshit. Make no mistake, this is the fallout from decades of domestic Gladio.

    • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’m probably never going to understand at all how the politically illiterate equate us and fascists. We don’t point at anything secret going on, we outline how these exact circumstances lead to these outcomes. We’re not talking about shadowy capitalists or secret plans of world domination

      I think there's a subset of the population that has a hard time believing that anyone could actually think this, perhaps largely because they find the idea of history being driven by material conditions, systemic forces, and accidents to be existentially horrifying. For that group of people, there's a fundamental assumption that both sides must think someone is pulling the strings, and when we criticize capitalism as a system (and specific capitalists for their specific actions), they assume that we must really be just obliquely referring to the same kind of cabal that the far right appeals to. The alternative--that the trajectory of history isn't controlled by anyone at all--is the kind of mind-shatteringly terrifying idea that some people just have a really hard time even entertaining.

      • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        this is probably also why liberals believe they can save society by simply placing the correct people in the correct roles, to safeguard any abuses from happening. Liberals also believe in a cabal of secret interests, but they see it as everyone who holds incorrect ideas in their heads. The racist old man down the street is viewed as equally influential in world affairs as Trump himself, because they're both part of the same group of incorrect racists. They're the ones who manifest the thoughtforms with their worldviews. So if worldviews change by elevating people with good, liberal ideas, then that spreads a curative medicine within the thought realm, making society inherently better.

        Our claim that people develop their ideology not purely on what they're told and taught, but rather, their experiences and position in the world, to them sounds like we don't believe in human agency. They must necessarily believe you can teach the rich out of their greed, that simple awareness is enough. It's because like you said, many liberals would have to examine why they hold liberal values in the first place. They'd have to question if they benefit from imperialism or poverty

        • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Great observation about human agency. I think this kind of thing also explains the fixation that certain :jordan-eboy-peterson: people have on "postmodernism" as well, and why they see it as basically the same thing as Marxism. The idea is that both ideologies see individuals as merely being a confluence of social categories and forces, with actual agentive action existing only around the margins. This is a sort of failure of imagination, I think--they can't see how there might be room for individual agency while also rejecting Great Man Theory. They think that our denial of the claim that history is driven by a small number of Atlases shrugging at key moments also amounts to a denial that anyone can ever do anything.

    • SaniFlush [any, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Easy, centrists are not actually listening to us at all because our ideas would require them to stop consuming luxury goods for ten seconds and actually stand for something.

    • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      We don’t point at anything secret going on, we outline how these exact circumstances lead to these outcomes. We’re not talking about shadowy capitalists or secret plans of world domination, the world is already dominated by capitalists who have names in the Forbes 500.

      Okay but... we kinda do though? Try to look at it from a liberal's perspective who watches CNN all day, believes that Biden is the most progressive president since FDR and thinks Bill Gates is a wholesome 100 philanthropist etc.

      The left talks a lot about how the CIA is behind all kinds of shit and how x and y are psyops or sth, and we constantly say things like "It's a big club and you're not in it." Do you not get how that would sound conspiratorial to someone? And yeah, sure, a lot of the CIA stuff is declassified and publicly available, but if liberals could read they wouldn't be liberals.

      The leftist narrative sounds crazy to liberals because they believe that the wealthy elites are playing fair and earned their way at the top by being hard-working and innovative, and if someone even more hard-working and innovative came along they would have no choice but to make way. They believe in the system. That's why "billionaires are evil parasites who are murdering millions to uphold their own wealth" sounds just as crazy to them as "the shadow cabal wants to establish global communism because they worship satan."

      • axont [she/her, comrade/them]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah, I get where you're coming from. It is difficult for middle class liberals to understand the level of horror enacted on the world to prop up billionaires and part of discussing that involves the centuries of imperialism. Liberals often have a cut-off date for when the bad stuff happened. They'll gladly hear us out about the fruit company coups or Guatemala or the possibility that Joseph McCarthy went overboard. Anything post Church Committee sounds like ludicrous speculation to them. Anything after the late 1970s is supposedly when the CIA became a force for good and American military excursions focused on spreading democracy. I've had a hard time convincing liberals that the USA is still enacting horrors to this day, especially in places like Africa and Latin America.

        If you can be generous with me, what I think I meant was we don't require all of that to explain ourselves. The billionaires are parasites and so is your local real estate company. The owner of 4 franchised Subway restaurants is a parasite. The landlord you lease from is a parasite, even if he only owns 2 properties. And that's not some clandestine relationship you have with these people, it's everyday circumstances where they're feeding off you. Liberals more often than not will identify with the perspective of the ownership class, either because that's where they aspire or that's where they belong. Like you said, they believe the rich got there by effort and were properly rewarded, because liberals aspire to these same rewards.

        Our ideas of everyday relationships between worker and owner, tenant and landlord, etc are that they're inherently exploitative regardless of any secrecy behind the scenes. I do think that's something more unique to the left, that we can explain ourselves in everyday circumstances. No one has to be pulling the strings behind my asshole boss demanding I work 4 hours of overtime without pay. He's an asshole because of that position he wields. Liberals will excuse this with "just work somewhere else" while failing to see capitalism as a worker is simply becoming a servant of one of the various parasites available.