Gendered slur edited out. Alice sucks even when she's correct. :deeply-reactionary:

Uncensored source tweet: https://nitter.lacontrevoie.fr/AliceAvizandum/status/1627386501532114945

  • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    It's cool to objectify woman actors if you're a trans lesbian. That makes it woke.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I haven't said the "T" word in weeks to see how long I could go without doing so.

          Moments like this and the delivery method of "if you don't like (questionable product) don't consume (questionable product)" cliche being used with a "shut up and never criticize (questionable product) again" implication to the message makes it hard to maintain that "T" fast. :sweat:

        • Ziege_Bock [any]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I'd just like to say that I do not want to be understood to be defending Kill James Bond, as I consider it to be a low quality podcast.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            What did you want, then? For criticism of that podcast to stop because you don't approve of criticism? :fry:

            • Ziege_Bock [any]
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don't know that I want anything out of this exchange. I don't expect to get anything either. I'm going to have to think about it for a spell, but I'm pretty sure I was just shit posting. Feel free to stop reading there, but I kind of want to cook for a bit. I guess this is becoming a journaling exercise.

              I guess I'd say that while I think that the artist and performance are always valid targets for criticism, I understood the earlier comments to be less of a criticism and more of a complaint. the difference being that a critique is a somewhat disaffected judgement or observation, while a complaint is a register of dissatisfaction with the object.

              I suppose I took a small degree of umbrage to the idea of someone lodging a complaint about the personal demeanor or comportment of a podcaster on a show that is anchored in the social interactions of the hosts. Full disclosure: I listened to an ep or two of KJB when it first came out and found it grating and stopped, but not before forming the opinion that it's not really a book report kind of podcast, people aren't really listening to it for movie summations or reviews; it's a show about three people watching a movie as a pretext to vibe with each other and maybe make some money.

              I feel that this makes a complaint about Alice's behavior, demeanor, or personality a redundant point to make. "I don't like the show, which is the personalities of the hosts, because of aspects of the hosts personalities. If that's the case, then I'd say you'd either just resolve yourself to making peace with the aspects of the show you find unpalatable or you stop listening to the show. Hence the "take it or leave it," sentiment I expressed earlier (which I admit was a little brusque).

              It reminds me of a throwaway Simpsons joke, where Flanders is making small talk at a party and says "You know, I like those Woody Allen movies, except that he's always got that nervous guy in them." It's a silly thing to do, right? It'd be more efficient and concise to say you don't like Alice or some of her behaviors; which, by the way, same.

            • Ziege_Bock [any]
              ·
              1 year ago

              well shoot, I hope my comment didn't make you feel bad. I just kind of think those are the two primary options when confronted with a less than desirable aspect of a thing which cannot be separated from that thing as a whole. I guess It could only be interpreted as a terse defense though. I will consider removing the post.