Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/1195kb7/us_most_young_men_are_single_most_young_women_are/
Halfway down the thread someone mentions that this article is based on a self-reported pew research poll and not any kind of more in-depth study.
Also whoever wrote the article either didn’t understand the actual poll or just outright lied about what the data showed lmao
comment on this:
If you drill down into the actual source of the data, which is a Pew research poll, you find a specific definition of "single". It is not actually "are you [not] dating someone".
In these stats, "single" refers to people who "are not married, living with a partner or in a committed relationship".
The important part here: a committed relationship. This is self-reported by the people being polled.
If two people are in a relationship, one may answer "yes" to this and the other may answer "no", depending on whether they see it as a "committed" relationship.
Thus, there is an interesting explanation for at least part of the data - perhaps young men don't consider themselves "committed" as often.
Combined with the age distribution phenomenon, this likely covers pretty much all of the discrepancy in the stats.
Original Pew Poll: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/ft_2023-02-08_facts-single-americans_01/
Fashy bros love to avoid putting a label on things and then blame women for not being in a relationship lol
Okay the 34% to 63% difference between women and men 18-29 is pretty extreme. I was expecting it to be something like 48% to 54%.
Also it makes me very suspicious about men over 65 being 8% less single than women that age… :cringe:
Ultimately I don’t view a self-reported Pew survey as being particularly meaningful data. Maybe I’m wrong on that, but I’ve read too many bullshit pop science articles to trust them.
men die a lot younger, makes sense that women would start outliving their partners after the mid-60’s.
There are definitely some sleazy old guys out there as well, though.