The notion that Biden represents a lesser evil compared to the chaotic reign of Trump is a common argument. However, we must not forget that there exists a moral threshold below which neither choice is acceptable. To suggest that enabling a literal genocide can be considered a lesser evil is a morally bankrupt stance.

Saying that voting for Biden is a moral obligation to prevent the return of Trump perpetuates a dangerous fallacy. It implies that the democratic party is immune from scrutiny and accountability, no matter the atrocities they commit. This line of thinking allows for a never-ending cycle of justification, as long as there's somebody considered worse, the democrats are granted a blank check. This is nothing more than a form of gaslighting, manipulating the public into believing that their only choice is between two evils, rather than demanding a better standard of leadership and true representation.

  • Procapra
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      4 months ago

      I don't understand how people come this conclusion. Surely people who read theory know Biden is also fascist?

      • Procapra
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        deleted by creator