There's a reason why academic jurists have had a debate over whether international law can actually be considered law in the first place as it is rarely enforced, is often impossible for anyone to enforce and when it is that enforcement is wildly inconsistent.
There's a reason why academic jurists have had a debate over whether international law can actually be considered law in the first place as it is rarely enforced, is often impossible for anyone to enforce and when it is that enforcement is wildly inconsistent.
And a big "no it's really law" argument is that most laws are enforced unevenly, so how is this so different?
:thinking-about-it: