take_five_seconds [he/him, any] to news • edit-21 year ago*Permanently Deleted*trashexternal-linkmessage-square87 fedilinkarrow-up159file-text
arrow-up159external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashtake_five_seconds [he/him, any] to news • edit-21 year agomessage-square87 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLigma_Male [comrade/them]hexbear2·1 year agoand this law is only addressing one of them. there's no reason to say the things you've said about this. Criticize it for not having broad enough scope if you want but "this anti-smoking law doesn't address vapes" is totally irrelevant. link
minus-squareWallOfBacon [none/use name]hexbear1·1 year ago those poor kids will have to get vape juice instead of cigarettes. the horror. ok so propose a law about vape shit you unfunny clown. Criticize it for not having broad enough scope if you want but “this anti-smoking law doesn’t address vapes” is totally irrelevant. Hexbear don't bring up a topic and then complain about the topic you brought up not being relevant to the conversation challenge impossible 100% fail. link
and this law is only addressing one of them. there's no reason to say the things you've said about this. Criticize it for not having broad enough scope if you want but "this anti-smoking law doesn't address vapes" is totally irrelevant.
Hexbear don't bring up a topic and then complain about the topic you brought up not being relevant to the conversation challenge impossible 100% fail.