Yeah, my first thought was: "You know what would curb climate change faster? Nuke the US. Why would you go for China when their emissions per capita are so much lower and literally 1/5 of all humans live there?"
But you're right. That kind of person doesn't care about science or what would actually fucking help the world, they just hate poor (and/or chinese) people.
I see the concept of per capita is still completely lost on some y*nks.
EDIT: I just noticed the ((())). Yeah, I am going to take a guess and say that climate change is not this individual's main concern in this scenario.
Yeah, my first thought was: "You know what would curb climate change faster? Nuke the US. Why would you go for China when their emissions per capita are so much lower and literally 1/5 of all humans live there?"
But you're right. That kind of person doesn't care about science or what would actually fucking help the world, they just hate poor (and/or chinese) people.
World's largest per capita polluter uses world's largest aggregate polluter as excuse to keep polluting, more at 11.