In mid-March, the WHO updated their definition of what makes COVID variants threatening and currently classifies XBB.1.5 as a "variant of interest," which means it is seen as less threatening than previous variants of concern.

Nonetheless, some virologists have argued that XBB and its close relatives are so genetically different from the very first strain of SARS-CoV-2 that it should technically be renamed a new virus, SARS-CoV-3.

"XBB.1.5 does show a growth advantage and a higher immune escape capacity, but evidence from multiple countries does not suggest that XBB and XBB.1.5 are associated with increased severity or mortality," Harris said. "In countries where the variant has driven an increase in cases, the waves are significantly smaller in scale compared to previous waves."

That's good news, but as the virus bounces between hemispheres, it may gain new mutations that allow it to infect more effectively or evade immunity. Some of our treatments, but not all, have stopped working against XBB strains. Monoclonal antibodies don't stop it, but antiviral drugs like Paxlovid and bivalent booster vaccines are still very effective.

But the combined lack of public interest in the pandemic, exemplified in victory marches from political leadership, has led to a shrinking pool of data on COVID as there is less funding afforded to tracking and research. As we've seen in previous surges, the situation can change without warning. The situation is made worse by wild animals that harbor COVID, a viral reservoir that could spill back to humanity if given the opportunity.

"The level of genomic surveillance has been dropping off, and there are also indications that funding for wastewater monitoring will be ending in some places," Dr. T. Ryan Gregory, an evolutionary and genome biologist at the University of Guelph in Canada, told Salon in an email. "We have far less information than we used to, which hampers the ability to detect and track new variants. It's also worth noting that India and China include about one-third of the world's population, and we have very little information on variants there."

Lmao I didn't realize the poop monitoring might be going away in the near future, too. Literally one of the last somewhat reliable things left, since the testing infrastructure has been completely gutted and the number of confirmed cases is a massive undercount.

:doomer:

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am not pleased that the poop monitoring will end. What do I do then? Just be the crazy person in the mask forever? Famine, war, plague, and white horse. and his name who rode on him was death, or something.

    • Sphere [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do I do then? Just be the crazy person in the mask forever?

      I'm not sure why the presence or absence of wastewater surveillance data is relevant to this decision. It's not like covid is ever going away regardless.

    • spicymangos51 [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      We're still out there, personally I still keep the mask since last time I went without one I caught a bug that was going around (maybe rsv, was around that time) I had COVID so maybe it's just my immune system being weaker now, but now I rather just not get sick in general.

  • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they kill wastewater monitoring, hospital numbers (open beds and whatnot) and excess morbidity will probably be all we have left to know even the slightest of what's going. On a delay, of course. :this-is-fine:

    • eatmyass
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • MF_BROOM [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      I checked the source in the article and it said most wastewater sites in the US are fully funded through 2025. But since nothing good ever happens in hellworld, I'd fully expect funds to dry out after that.

      • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        🤞 looking forward to Republicans passing a bill that the wastewater sites have to redirect all their funds towards tracking fentanyl in the wastewater or something.

        • MF_BROOM [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          1 year ago

          looking forward to Republicans passing a bill that the wastewater sites have to redirect all their funds towards tracking fentanyl in the wastewater

          The real pandemic, amirite?

  • TheModerateTankie [any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Endless variants of one of the most contagious and damaging viruses we've ever seen, infecting billions of people and animals every couple months, in an incredibly interconnected world. What could go wrong?

  • barrbaric [he/him]M
    ·
    1 year ago

    "If SARS-CoV-2 is so good, why is there no SARS-CoV-3?" :cereal1:

    :cereal2:

    Death to america, etc

  • InevitableSwing [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    As we’ve seen in previous surges, the situation can change without warning. The situation is made worse by wild animals that harbor COVID, a viral reservoir that could spill back to humanity if given the opportunity.

    We are all players performing our minor roles in the world's dumbest dystopia story.

    XBB.1.5

    They really need to give the variants names ordinary people can use.

    I didn’t realize the poop monitoring might be going away

    I didn't either. As a wise man once said "If we stopped testing right now - we'd have very few cases."

  • eatmyass
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • JoeByeThen [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I'd love to know the same because I've heard of a large number of questionable antigen test results for at least the last year. Heck, I know more than a handful of people that tested positive and then negative after new years, but since no one around me bothers getting pcr tests, who fucking knows which was the false result.