If there's no dancing, it's not my revolution.
This is the perfect combination of cringe, art and education to make it blow up among zoomers.
I'm audibly saying "stop doing that" every time she does that pelvic thrust.
You can revolve if you want to
You can leave your bourgeois behind
But if you don't dance and if you don't dance
You're no comrade of mine
synth riffs
I've only heard this song and I Like. Do they have anymore bangers?
They were kinda 1 hit wonders, honestly it's the only song by "Men Without Hats" I am familiar with
"The Men Who Wear Many Hats" did, however, produce a zombie video game and some very funny smut. Worth checking out.
Gives new credence to
YOU CAN'T LAST MORE THAN 5 SECONDS
I had to close it. Too cringe
Okay weird dancing aside she has a good point, blackrock is having it's reputation laundered by neoliberals who're trying to hide from people who they really are and what they're up to. I see commercials for them all the time on CNN
have you tried to do agitprop while performing a number at the same time? me neither but it looks hard!
It does, but that doesn’t make it uhh, idunno, I’m trying not to be an art hater so I guess I’ll just zip it
No, I don't think I'd call it cringy exactly. Idk what it is really, its... very strange
i don't think that's why, actually
cute video though, had me LOLing
Not very good information. Blackrock and Vanguard (and State Street, who manage the SPY index fund) dominate the index fund market, so they "own" a significant chunk of every tradable company, but that backs shares of ETFs and mutual funds which are actually owned by others. If I had to guess, I think most of the truly wealthy probably don't own much via index funds and mutual funds. Index funds and mutual funds probably skew to 401ks. The real assholes concentrate their ownership on a few things, rather than all companies equally, so they can get control of companies. Still most stock is owned by a small number of people and I think most shares of index funds are owned by a small number of people, and our obsession with post hoc justifications for the highest possible return to capital benefit a pretty small number of people immensely and you're probably not one of them.
Yeah, that was my problem with the video too. However, it is worth noting that even though an individual might own a share of an exchange-traded mutual fund, they almost never receive any voting power. This isn't surprising, because it's basically like owning a fraction of a fraction of a share. What is worth wondering, however, is who gets the vote. Imo Blackrock and Vanguard do - it's not like they're secretly and evilly controlling the world's economy, but they do certainly tend to vote in the interests of their shares not dropping in value.
Well, I sure can't sort all this nonsense out. Maybe God can? We can send this free marketplace of ideas over to Them.
United States Of America?
More like Urine...ur....urine..urine nat...piss country
Got it
Ey, you the Stalin guy?
Nations are bullshit, they ought not to exist, but countries and nations are confining political entities that still hold material power and it isn't that each actor in national borders plays a trick on us, it is just that their interests often, but not always align.
I don't know who the Stalin guy is? Just making a urination joke. But I definitely wouldn't agree that interest just often coincidentally align. That completely ignores things like the mass media capture, School of the Americas, and the Chicago Boys hegemony.
Huh? Do you know anything about free trade neoliberalism? Capital is unrestricted by nations in the 'free world'. That's the point as I understood it.
