https://twitter.com/jacobin/status/1649729770635051008?s=20

  • plinky [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t think international solidarity was seen since 70s? And even then, natural link with anti-globalist movement was not established

    • plinky [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Maybe I have wrong impression, but I think anti-global trade movement of the 90s-00s didn’t make an argument of “stop imports which are made with less X bucks an hour wage, cause this would offshore your job”

      • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        i don't remember that discourse having any class consciousness, it was just overt racists vs liberal racists who wanted cheap labor.

        • plinky [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          What? I don’t think seattle was lacking in class consciousness, I think either their messaging was meh or I was reality invented. Or they couldn’t break through with rhetoric :deeper-sadness:

      • D61 [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yup, it was always framed as if China, or Japan, or Korea was "stealing" the good jobs from the USA. Even though what really was happening was that the USA businesses were sending those jobs overseas all on their own.

        • Golgafrinchan [none/use name]
          ·
          2 years ago

          That didn't happen on its own. It was US government policy to give preferential treatment to other countries, opening US markets wide, while letting those same countries close their markets to American made goods. This could only harm the American worker.

          The nail in the coffin was NAFTA. Ross Perot was right about the "great sucking sound" of American working class jobs disappearing to Mexico.