• panopticon [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I am pointing out that these arguments:

    we shouldn’t eat pork because pigs are as intelligent and emotional as three year old humans.

    if you cut the head of a chicken off at the brain stem it can survive more or less indefinably. It’s basically a giant bug and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with eating it.

    Insisting that human nutrition should be de-prioritized in favor of the lives of animals that roughly have the intelligence of five Beatles is essentially eco-fascist.

    are unrelated to the historical argument and using the former to bolster the latter is incoherent. Okay, if raising chickens is an important component of a whole food system then great, like I said eat the eggs, you still haven't connected that with the practice of eating meat

    But chickens are not bugs and saying hey maybe we don't need to eat them isn't eco fascist, chickens form attachments, fear for their lives, enjoy being petted and held by humans. Bugs don't care for any of that shit except for staying alive.

    I think I've made my point clear so I'm done here, peace✌️

    • sysgen [none/use name,they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point of eating livestock is that if you just let them die you've wasted resources. You can argue that's worth it, but the connection to the practice of eating meat is there.