1) There's two things that work: Direct Action and pressure campaigns.

in a pressure campaign, you've got to figure out who's got decision making power and target them specifically. It can be a politician who's a swing vote, a boss who's refusing to recognize a union, the bargaining team for the police officers guild, or a landlord who's refusing repairs.

Figure out your leverage. Workers have leverage in that they provide labor. tennants have leverage in providing rent. voters provide votes. There's other kinds of pressure too, for example, landlords often care about impressing neighbors, coworkers, charitable organization board members, and fellow congregants. Universities need to retain students. But! you might not have leverage over every target! A massive chain's shareholders might be able to eat the impact of a strike, but a local manager might lose his job because of it. In that case, your leverage is over him, not the shareholders.

Every action should be part of an escalation campaign. In other words, start small (petitions, buttons, pins, etc.), build up bigger, maybe to flyering. Then work up to pickets. After that, protests, after that, vandalism and blockades, etc. This way, the longer things go on, the worse it gets for your target. They can make it all stop by giving a raise, or doing repairs, or freezing the rents, or ceasing construction. It is not enough to just protest!

In direct action, you make what you want happen yourself. Churches hate hunger, so they organize food banks; food banks are now the most effective form of welfare in america. Animal rights activists hate mink farming, so they sabotage the farms; the PNW fur industry is now a 10th the size it was in the 80s. Puerto Ricans were being denied aid after a hurricane, so they snuck into the aid warehouses and delivered it themselves. The IWW hated having bosses, so they elected their own and refused to recognize the company's. Revolution is direct action on a mass scale

2) Don't be a weirdo! The other day, a Maoist came up to me in a red scarf and started asking me questions about my struggles as a worker. The maoist asthetic is off-putting and corny. Acting like you're a third party outside of the working class is cringe. You're a worker, I'm a worker. If you want to find out about my struggles, gripe about work with me. Calling it social investigation makes you think of yourself as a detective. You're not a detective, you're my pal getting drinks after work.

DSA grew so fast because they called themselves "democratic socialists." That's just optics. A lot of DSA work is the same as ML party work: strike support, salting, socialist education, mutual aid, shooting practice. But they got more members because they used words and asthetics americans are comfortable with. Ditch the red scarf and the hammer and sickle and the fealty to Mao. It doesn't mean don't read and apply Mao, it just means be normal.

3) you've got to be engaged in struggles in your own life. You can't just ask other people to have a revolution for you. In the 70s, socialist parties had their members all take jobs in the same factories and organize fighting unions in them. Your party can go into warehouses, hospitals, meatpacking plants, even universities! Anywhere there's thousands of workers. The IWW helps general membership organize each others workplaces. Salting or organizing where you stand doesn't matter. What matters is that you're helping each other to organize in your own lives. you can do the same thing living in the same apartment building or forming a solidarity network to fight for each others stolen deposits. You can even go to the same church!

Protests ask other people to act. Organizing in your own life prepares you and your community to act. If you're raising awareness about imperialism, you're asking other people to act. On the other hand, if you organize with the diaspora, in their apartments, in their workplaces, in their churches, you're creating the capacity to overthrow their oppressors with them.

4) You can't win without people

Militancy is good, but you've got to warm most people up to it. You do this through one on one conversations or by fighting and winning to demonstrate it can be done (and then through more one on ones).

If you're not sure if you can pull off a big action, do a structure test! You can test individuals by asking them to do something like "get so and so to sign a petition." You can structure test coworkers through petitions, getting people to wear pins or holding a mock strike vote. You can structure test neighborhoods by going door to door asking people to sign pledge cards or give you their contact info.

If your structure test fails, it's time to do more one on ones. If you act with a small group, you'll get retaliated against. There's safety in numbers, so build numbers.

what might this look like? A few hypotheticals:

Stop cop city:

What if local groups ran escalation campaigns against local offices of contractors and funders associated with the project? What happens to the project when investment managers at local banks are subjected to pressure campaigns? When regional directors of building contractors are as well? How about when shareholders start getting phone zapped?

Defund the Police:

What if the next time the cops were bargaining a contract with the city and putting up resistance to reform, we mounted pressure on their bargaining team? How dedicated to qualified immunity would their bargainers be when there's a pressure campaign on the landlords and their pastors? What if we were in power in the unions and could threaten to kick the police out of the labor council if they weren't open to reforms?

Covid 19:

What if our response to Covid had been to organize for sick time and ventilation upgrades in our workplaces? If we were in warehouses and could win those reforms in a 5000 person workplace, that would have a huge impact on viral spread.

In short: Stop protesting, start organizing.

  • tuga [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Raises important question, what does “being normal” entail? Are openly queer comrades working in hostile environments not ‘normal’?

    It means don't call people fascist for every little thing

    • wild_dog
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      deleted by creator

      • tuga [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        this is great but how we are defining “every little thing”?

        Being bigotted/not as socially progressive as you are.

        There are plenty of working class people who think telling people not to say slurs is “being weird.”

        Depends on the slur but...talk to them about that if you want but don't call them a fascist in person just to be done with it

        My point is don't throw someone out entirely for being problematic, maybe they can't be a good communist but their material interests are likely aligned with yours so they can still be union members and strike

        • wild_dog
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          deleted by creator

          • tuga [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’m asking you to explain how marginalized people can stand up for ourselves and not be treated like we’re “being weird”

            I never said standing up for yourself is being weird, in fact I think being insulted and just standing there isn't normal at all but I guess if you're queer and you're tasked with talking to someone who is openly bigoted against you then someone else in your organization should do it, that's the benefit of being in an organization even if you're, understandably, not ok with doing something (that nevertheless should be done) there might be someone who is.

      • Ideology [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Being normal: "hey, so that word is kind of rude to people like <coworker>, they might not want to help us out if you keep saying things like that. This kind of stuff works if as many people are involved as possible, so even if you don't like <coworker> we should be open to working with them to make the group stronger. [Alt. I know you like hanging out with <coworker> so you want them to feel chill working with us, right?]"

        Not being normal: "your use of slurs is a textbook example of racism. It's exclusionary and jargon jargon jargon."

        The second one is technically correct, but doesn't actually teach the person you're talking to that racism/sexism/etc is a dividing strategy used by the bourgeoisie. The former spells it out but frames it in as simple of terms as possible. People understand the concept of being on friendly terms with someone to achieve a larger goal rather intuitively. They just have to be convinced it will work.

      • ChapoChatGPT [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        It's very case dependent but the key is to try to think as strategically as possible (of course understanding that we're also humans with emotions and needs). People you're trying to agitate with are never going to be perfect.

        In the case of reactionaries, it's okay to respond to their nonsense by calling it fascist, but something being justified doesn't mean it's strategic and achieves your goals. If you've determined they've got revolutionary potential (i.e. they're working class and not financially comfortable) then you've got to try to meet them where they're at.

        Of course a lot of people are not worth the effort, in which case do whatever serves you.

    • OliCromwellOfficial [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Star Wars is fascist, Harry Potter is fascist neo-feudal dreck, selfie-obsession is fascist, British soap-operas are fascist, sci-fi is generally fascist, ironic detachment is fascist, porn is fascist. Masscult under imperialism is inherently fascistic. Sorry to spoil your 'fun'.