• Tormato [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    15 minutes of choking somebody is murder. That lawyer statement released on his behalf was one of the lamest, most pathetically transparent admission of guilt too.

    Fucking POS scumbag fascist vigilante.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      He'll be acquitted. The prosecutors are going to phone this one in so hard, his shit legal defense won't matter.

  • aaro [they/them, she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    hey, at least manslaughter is more likely to stick than murder, right? :what-the-hell:

    • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      And probably will be out of prison on good behavior; here's to hoping his fellow inmates show him the right way to choke someone out.

    • mkultrawide [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Yes, with first degree manslaughter, you have to prove that they had intent to injure, which my guess is will be hard with this guy.

    • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, the manslaughter charge implies that the DA is saying that Neely died as a result of negligence rather than the intent to kill.

        • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]
          hexagon
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah; the justification often given in these situations is that the lesser charge has a greater likelihood to stick in controversial cases, but if that's what the DA's office did, it just suggests they think the typical American is a bloodthirsty monster. My money's on "tepid response to negative press," but no reason it isn't also the former.

          • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]
            ·
            2 years ago

            it just suggests they think the typical American is a bloodthirsty monster

            One side bloodthirsty, the other bloodless, probably the only reason the two can tolerate each other and find some coexistence, and why their opinions if not overlapping, then at least not at odds.

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Its at least arguable that he intended to restrain rather than kill, and Neely's death was a result of recklessness intend of malicious intent.

        Either way, manslaughter is a serious enough charge that he'll want to fight it. And given the state of NY politics right now, he'll very likely be acquitted.

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    deleted by creator

  • YoungSheldonAdelson [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    They keep calling him a "former Marine" on David Muir's show. The phrase isn't "Once a Marine, sometimes a Marine, as long as you don't choke out an innocent person on a New York subway in a grotesque fit of vigilantism using combat techniques that we trained you to do to innocent folks in the global south."

    • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      He felt entitled to do this on US soil, now imagine what he was doing where he was deployed.

      Or don't if you'd like to stay sane.

  • Cummunism [they/them, he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    i did an oopsie when i closed off a person esophagus for 15 minutes. id be a prison abolitionist if i didnt think this scumbag needed to be in it for the rest of his life(at minimum)

    • OutrageousHairdo [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      The knowledge that prison and capital punishment are evil things to do, specifically inflicting pointless suffering on fellow human beings vs the desire to :gulaged: and :pit: reactionaries.

    • very_poggers_gay [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Was gonna say… I saw the videos of this online and this piece of scum had plenty of help killing Jordan Neely :doomjak:

      • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]
        ·
        2 years ago

        The sad thing is if only one person had stepped in it would've been two against three. Literally three people helping to murder a starving man.