arrow-up155imagewat?FuckyWucky [none/use name] to games • 1 year agomessage-square14 Commentsfedilink
minus-squarechickentendrils [any, comrade/them]hexbear21·1 year agoMaybe they've added historically accurate attempts to undermine revolution link
minus-squareGolabki [comrade/them,undecided]hexbear18·1 year agoIn the worst way possible tbh. Currently the game refuses to allow a vanguard party led communist state from regime changing monarchies because they are both “authoritarian”. link
minus-squareRamrodBaguette [comrade/them, he/him]hexbear5·edit-21 year agoThey're going to make "one-party states" a thing distinct from autocracies, at least. If you ask me, though, "vanguardism" is a stupid fucking concept and feels out of place compared to the rest of the game. link
minus-squareGolabki [comrade/them,undecided]hexbear5·1 year agoI agree, the whole point of the game is using material changes to shape the ideology and a vanguard somewhat goes against that. link
Maybe they've added historically accurate attempts to undermine revolution
In the worst way possible tbh. Currently the game refuses to allow a vanguard party led communist state from regime changing monarchies because they are both “authoritarian”.
They're going to make "one-party states" a thing distinct from autocracies, at least.
If you ask me, though, "vanguardism" is a stupid fucking concept and feels out of place compared to the rest of the game.
I agree, the whole point of the game is using material changes to shape the ideology and a vanguard somewhat goes against that.