Wouldn’t they be heavier if those buildings were full of people everyday? Insane way to try and guilt workers back into the office.

  • Lovely_sombrero [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I like the implication that remote work has something to do with this, yes.

    I guess the author's intent was something like "NY City is sinking because of heavy buildings and no one is even using those buildings, what a waste". Sort of like saying "he committed suicide by dropping a now useless grand piano on his head".

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Fortune mag has been coping and seething over remote work for years. The owners are probably heavily invesfed in commercial real estate.

    • Parzivus [any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah if they're measuring sea level rise, it sounds like NYC has it better than most. New Orleans is losing almost a centimeter per year

  • BeamBrain [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Bulldoze the skyscrapers, replace them with public parks

  • kissinger
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • Fishroot [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well you can make affordable housing with the emptying skyscrapers. It’s actually a better investment for company turning them into renting apartments for your employees to WFH